Got high, wanted to watch mythbusters, and see this. Great experience._number8_@lemmy.world to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com – 415 points – 8 months ago51Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentInternational rates vs domestic, if I had to guess.Also licensing deals can be country-specificthere should be a wordwide fair trade pactDude, trade between countries is extremely difficult and complicated. There isn't a world wide set trade for anything. You'd think there could be, but it's just not realistic.The gap is too wide to agree, even between europe and the US there is a radically opposite stance between pro- and anti-consumer rights.It would be like the Trans Pacific Partnership, strengthening IP and DRM.This is the reason.
International rates vs domestic, if I had to guess.Also licensing deals can be country-specificthere should be a wordwide fair trade pactDude, trade between countries is extremely difficult and complicated. There isn't a world wide set trade for anything. You'd think there could be, but it's just not realistic.The gap is too wide to agree, even between europe and the US there is a radically opposite stance between pro- and anti-consumer rights.It would be like the Trans Pacific Partnership, strengthening IP and DRM.This is the reason.
Also licensing deals can be country-specificthere should be a wordwide fair trade pactDude, trade between countries is extremely difficult and complicated. There isn't a world wide set trade for anything. You'd think there could be, but it's just not realistic.The gap is too wide to agree, even between europe and the US there is a radically opposite stance between pro- and anti-consumer rights.It would be like the Trans Pacific Partnership, strengthening IP and DRM.This is the reason.
there should be a wordwide fair trade pactDude, trade between countries is extremely difficult and complicated. There isn't a world wide set trade for anything. You'd think there could be, but it's just not realistic.The gap is too wide to agree, even between europe and the US there is a radically opposite stance between pro- and anti-consumer rights.It would be like the Trans Pacific Partnership, strengthening IP and DRM.
Dude, trade between countries is extremely difficult and complicated. There isn't a world wide set trade for anything. You'd think there could be, but it's just not realistic.
The gap is too wide to agree, even between europe and the US there is a radically opposite stance between pro- and anti-consumer rights.
International rates vs domestic, if I had to guess.
Also licensing deals can be country-specific
there should be a wordwide fair trade pact
Dude, trade between countries is extremely difficult and complicated. There isn't a world wide set trade for anything.
You'd think there could be, but it's just not realistic.
The gap is too wide to agree, even between europe and the US there is a radically opposite stance between pro- and anti-consumer rights.
It would be like the Trans Pacific Partnership, strengthening IP and DRM.
This is the reason.