Jill Stein formally launches 2024 White House bid as Green party candidate

Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to News@lemmy.world – 174 points –
Jill Stein formally launches 2024 White House bid as Green party candidate
theguardian.com
358

You are viewing a single comment

the only outcome you get is the party you agree with least winning because you wanted to send a message to the party you partially agreed with.

it's not about sending a message to democrats or republicans. it's about who i want to win. also, it's really hard to tell which party i agree with least.

That's what I thought the first time as well. It turns out that who you want to win means fuck all in real life. It's a bit like saying "I don't want my arm to be broken" when you fall on it. I'm sure you don't, but if you care about how it heals you'll go to the hospital and get a cast put on it, even if it's uncomfortable.

And to me, it's easy to figure out who I agree with least. One of them actively wants LGBT folks dead, and the other one doesn't actively want that. Everything else could be exactly the same and it would still be braindead easy to figure out.

if it means so much to you, I live in a swing state. the state penalty for selling my vote is $5k. that's the federal fine, too. put another 10k on top for my troubles and I'll vote any way you like.

I wouldn't count on the Democrats to keep genocidal maniacs from your doorstep. better to get a gun and join a local resistance movement.

I'd rather the people that don't presently want genocidal maniacs killing me and my friends be in office than the genocidal maniacs themselves, and you must recognize that it is, in fact, one of those two choices that are going to win.

Democrats fund genocide. you need to save yourself.

And republicans don't do that even more?

there aren't acceptable degrees

So given the choice between someone actively demanding genocide and someone who's passively supporting a genocide, you'd sooner see more people murdered than vote for the lesser evil?

id sooner not support either one. neither is acceptable

So you would sooner choose to let more people suffer than involve yourself in seeing fewer people suffer. What an awful person you are.

in the trolley thought experiment, I don't pull the lever because I'm not a murderer

Yeah you are. If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice. You don't get to not involve yourself, not pulling the lever is as much an active choice to kill 5 people as pulling the lever is a choice to kill one.

You value your own sense of self righteousness over the lives of other people, and that's awful and selfish.

not pulling the lever is as much an active choice to kill 5 people as pulling the lever is a choice to kill one.

that's not what deontologists believe

21 more...

You value your own sense of self righteousness over the lives of other people, and that's awful and selfish.

and I'd say you value your own sense of power over the lives of the person you killed.

2 more...
23 more...
23 more...
23 more...
23 more...
23 more...
23 more...
23 more...
23 more...
23 more...
23 more...

they're not the same with one exception tho. they're both deeply bad In similar and unique ways. neither is acceptable.

In what way are Democrats bad, that Republicans aren't?

they want to restrict guns to government thugs. they lie about supporting unions, stabbing the working class in the back.

Better than republicans who were the first ones doing gun control because black people had guns, and who are openly hostile to unions and the working class, and treat them even worse.

I don't think getting stabbed in the back is better than getting stabbed in the front.

23 more...

Good news is there's like 300 of you in the country so it doesn't matter

23 more...