You can always count on the NY Post to distort the truth to get some really juicy headlines. He is charged with pandering (attempting to pay for sex). Not human trafficking, although it was a human trafficking sting operation.
You're not wrong. However, I am bound by
Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
You can always count on the NY Post to distort the truth to get some really juicy headlines. He is charged with pandering (attempting to pay for sex). Not human trafficking, although it was a human trafficking sting operation.
You're not wrong. However, I am bound by
You could use a better source. For example: https://www.thedailybeast.com/top-pentagon-official-stephen-hovanic-arrested-in-human-trafficking-sting
Is "Top Pentagon Official Arrested in Human Trafficking Sting" really that much better of a title?
Not really, but at least it's not the trash that is the Daily Mail.
Daily beast: the standard of journalism
OP posted a link to the NY Post so I'm not sure what your point is.
It is not a comment on your post, it is only about the NY Post and their sensationalism methods.