Have things gotten that bad that you can’t tell if that was sarcastic?
Shit.
you sound like a tesla bro, so we really can't tell.
I honestly thought it was so far over the top that it’d be obvious. I will have to start including the /s
Have you met a tesla bro? I know one guy who insists Tesla's are the best cars ever made. You can hear him driving in a mile down the road from the body work whistling like a stuka siren.
I have bought drinks for Tesla engineers and have known that they were a terrible company with spit and chewing gum holding them together for years now. I think the point that broke Elon’s brain was the Model 3 shitstorm that could have cost him almost everything. I believe he admitted to Kara Swisher that he was sleeping at his desk for half an hour per night for weeks on end because of the amount of speed he was doing. He was always an asshole, but it was after that incident that he just went completely unhinged.
he was always uhinged, though. what changed was the PR filter that kept him looking like a genius.
It really should be taken as way over the top, but with shit like this said all the time without an ounce of irony... It was impossible to tell
People took A Modest Proposal seriously, both when it was written, and when we read it in English class.
Are...are we not eating children? Hold on, I need to make a few phone calls...
Given that things like tone that are normally used to show sarcasm dont show through text, the only way if one doesnt explicitly state something to be sarcasm to tell if something written is sarcastic is if the statement seems so absurd or obviously wrong that nobody could seriously believe it. However, people have a seemingly limitless capacity to believe things that are factually untrue, and what is and is not absurd is to some extent in the eye of the beholder, so ultimately, one should not be surprised if one's written sarcasm is taken seriously, if you dont include some kind of signifier to replace the cues normally given in speech.
The passenger volume, cost, and build-it-today claims are I think in line with theirs. The only outlier is the energy claim, which is so absurdly false that it falls into puffery (think 'red bull gives you wings') and is again believable.
It's clear HSR costs, and infrastructure in general, are getting out of control in the English-speaking world. It's not clear how to fix this, but moving from proven and understood technology to Muppet technology doesn't seem to be a good option.
Not sure if sarcastic...
Have things gotten that bad that you can’t tell if that was sarcastic?
Shit.
you sound like a tesla bro, so we really can't tell.
I honestly thought it was so far over the top that it’d be obvious. I will have to start including the /s
Have you met a tesla bro? I know one guy who insists Tesla's are the best cars ever made. You can hear him driving in a mile down the road from the body work whistling like a stuka siren.
I have bought drinks for Tesla engineers and have known that they were a terrible company with spit and chewing gum holding them together for years now. I think the point that broke Elon’s brain was the Model 3 shitstorm that could have cost him almost everything. I believe he admitted to Kara Swisher that he was sleeping at his desk for half an hour per night for weeks on end because of the amount of speed he was doing. He was always an asshole, but it was after that incident that he just went completely unhinged.
he was always uhinged, though. what changed was the PR filter that kept him looking like a genius.
It really should be taken as way over the top, but with shit like this said all the time without an ounce of irony... It was impossible to tell
People took A Modest Proposal seriously, both when it was written, and when we read it in English class.
Are...are we not eating children? Hold on, I need to make a few phone calls...
Given that things like tone that are normally used to show sarcasm dont show through text, the only way if one doesnt explicitly state something to be sarcasm to tell if something written is sarcastic is if the statement seems so absurd or obviously wrong that nobody could seriously believe it. However, people have a seemingly limitless capacity to believe things that are factually untrue, and what is and is not absurd is to some extent in the eye of the beholder, so ultimately, one should not be surprised if one's written sarcasm is taken seriously, if you dont include some kind of signifier to replace the cues normally given in speech.
Poe's Law
The passenger volume, cost, and build-it-today claims are I think in line with theirs. The only outlier is the energy claim, which is so absurdly false that it falls into puffery (think 'red bull gives you wings') and is again believable.
It's clear HSR costs, and infrastructure in general, are getting out of control in the English-speaking world. It's not clear how to fix this, but moving from proven and understood technology to Muppet technology doesn't seem to be a good option.
:(