but ONLY if those fictional characters are adults and providing informed consent
The chatbot I downloaded was luckily more than eager to.
That chatbot probably isn't even 10 years old!
The bio said 28 though!
And acted that way too.
claiming to be an adult and "acting" mature? sounds like something a middle schooler would do... you better be careful! :p
Well, I am an adult and from time to time I too am acting my age.
But I'm far over the age of what probably is a middle schooler. ;P
We're adults and its consensual (we're doing CNC age play)
Pokemon can comprehend human speech fully and are therefore sentient, thus they can consent so we're all good
children cannot consent despite the fact that they can comprehend human speech fully and are fully sentient so UH NO NOT OKAY VERY FUCKING FAR FROM OK
now that said, depiction of an adult human being who is, from the very outset, pre-established to be of sound mind and fully informed AND consenting, but who also possesses strictly superficial attributes of fictional characters, remains within the bounds of the ethically acceptable.
but ONLY if those fictional characters are adults and providing informed consent
The chatbot I downloaded was luckily more than eager to.
That chatbot probably isn't even 10 years old!
The bio said 28 though!
And acted that way too.
claiming to be an adult and "acting" mature? sounds like something a middle schooler would do... you better be careful! :p
Well, I am an adult and from time to time I too am acting my age.
But I'm far over the age of what probably is a middle schooler. ;P
We're adults and its consensual (we're doing CNC age play)
Pokemon can comprehend human speech fully and are therefore sentient, thus they can consent so we're all good
children cannot consent despite the fact that they can comprehend human speech fully and are fully sentient so UH NO NOT OKAY VERY FUCKING FAR FROM OK
now that said, depiction of an adult human being who is, from the very outset, pre-established to be of sound mind and fully informed AND consenting, but who also possesses strictly superficial attributes of fictional characters, remains within the bounds of the ethically acceptable.