Nintendo Switch emulator, Yuzu, developers settling lawsuit from Nintendo with $2.4M payout, handing over its domains, and agreeing "Yuzu [is] primarily designed to circumvent [DRM]".

pivot_root@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.world – 640 points –
Nintendo Switch emulator Yuzu will utterly fold and pay $2.4M to settle its lawsuit
theverge.com

This also includes ceasing development and destroying their copies of the code.

The GitHub repo page for Yuzu now returns a 404, as well. In addition, the repo for the Citra 3DS emulator was also taken down.

As of at least 23:30 UTC, Yuzu's website and Citra's website have been replaced with a statement about their discontinuation.


Other sources found by @Daughter3546@lemmy.world:


There is also an active Reddit thread about this: https://www.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/1b6gtb5/

154

You are viewing a single comment

The electronic key I purchased and collected from my own hardware is "hacking" because Nintendo's doesn't intend it? Maybe the legality of selling a tool to get the key is a hard concept to grasp because the premise is objectionable. If a Switch makes a good doorstop then it will be doing it's "intended purpose" if that's what I intend for my property.

I'm against companies having unjust control over our own computing. Eventually we will stop tolerating the abuse of people contributing to an open/libre community.

You might own the hardware, but you don't own the rights to the OS that runs on it. The encryption key is part of that software.

It's not a hard concept to grasp. If I was openly selling a tool to break the activation lock on Windows, I could expect the same result.

That's a ridiculous idea. If I buy a computer with an OS that has an encryption key to protect the hard drive, and later I need that key to remove my data to another system, I have an entirely reasonable expectation that I'm allowed to do so, regardless of how much the computer manufacturer doesn't want me to.

1 more...
1 more...