Careful, Pascal doesn't like it when you call him a camel
I decided to be wrong because the correct joke would be too convoluted. I’ll work on that implementation and then you can inject it at runtime via reflection.
Thanks for preparing your comment for my dependency injection! I agree that refactorability of comments is preferable over prematurely optimizing for performance.
First it needs to work, then it needs to work well, and finally it may or may not work quickly. Along the way, it should also be humorously weird.
Would you like a snake to replace your camel?
Careful, Pascal doesn't like it when you call him a camel
I decided to be wrong because the correct joke would be too convoluted. I’ll work on that implementation and then you can inject it at runtime via reflection.
Thanks for preparing your comment for my dependency injection! I agree that refactorability of comments is preferable over prematurely optimizing for performance.
First it needs to work, then it needs to work well, and finally it may or may not work quickly. Along the way, it should also be humorously weird.
Best I can do instead is calling it
x.Why not ‘i’?