It's almost as if my point was the laziness of a broad brush and the inability to have a conversation without falling back to antics deserving of the playground.
Well that's not the point of the comic, so that was a massive failure.
Subtext is hard, but I do believe you can learn to find it.
Unfortunately, I have little doubt that you'll continue giving cover to fascists in the name of enlightened centrism.
It's almost as if my point was the laziness of a broad brush and the inability to have a conversation without falling back to antics deserving of the playground.
Well that's not the point of the comic, so that was a massive failure.
Subtext is hard, but I do believe you can learn to find it.
Unfortunately, I have little doubt that you'll continue giving cover to fascists in the name of enlightened centrism.
I’m sorry, the card says “moops.”
Oh no, please don't hit me with your broad brush of righteousness and name calling... Whatever will I do?
Continue to push your false equivalency, obviously.
Every accusation is a confession, no?
So when you said I was self-righteous and calling you names...
...I replied below the name-calling. Clever, right?
Now you only need to identify the purported false equivalency to match suit.
I'm not going to do a little dance for you.
Oh no, how many Nazis did I just make there?!
Exactly, who needs evidence or to actually grapple with the beliefs of others when you can just blithely throw labels about?