I can excuse genocide incitement, but I draw the line at suicide incitement.
I don't excuse genocide incitement, that is inexcusable. But nobody was doing that, so. 👍
true, that fucker was inciting omnicide, which is even worse. why do vile ecofascists like you always do lip service to the fact that the statement "the world would be better without [insert ethnic group]" is evil but are suddenly ok with the prospect of murdering even more people? absolutely disgusting ideology of yours.
They weren't inciting anything. They were just answering the question of what the world would be better off without.
They aren't saying humans should actually be murdered. It is hard to deny the fact that we as a human race do nothing but exploit nature right now, rather than coexist with it. That is what is being said. Not that "we should kill all humans". That's reading too much into it, just like you are reading way too much into what I'm supposedly insinuating (i.e. "murdering even more people", which makes no sense because nobody was talking about murdering anybody lol).
Relax. I have not expressed anything that you can derive an ideology from. So you should not get your debate-trigger-happy panties in a twist over anything that's being said here. It's an objective, truthful answer to OP's question.
I'm not saying anybody should die. The commenter is not saying anybody should die. You aren't saying anybody should die, right?
All good? 🤝
That would be only one less hunans.He can do better if he puts his back into it.
you could start with yourself
Not cool. Do not incite suicide.
I don't excuse genocide incitement, that is inexcusable. But nobody was doing that, so. 👍
true, that fucker was inciting omnicide, which is even worse. why do vile ecofascists like you always do lip service to the fact that the statement "the world would be better without [insert ethnic group]" is evil but are suddenly ok with the prospect of murdering even more people? absolutely disgusting ideology of yours.
They weren't inciting anything. They were just answering the question of what the world would be better off without.
They aren't saying humans should actually be murdered. It is hard to deny the fact that we as a human race do nothing but exploit nature right now, rather than coexist with it. That is what is being said. Not that "we should kill all humans". That's reading too much into it, just like you are reading way too much into what I'm supposedly insinuating (i.e. "murdering even more people", which makes no sense because nobody was talking about murdering anybody lol).
Relax. I have not expressed anything that you can derive an ideology from. So you should not get your debate-trigger-happy panties in a twist over anything that's being said here. It's an objective, truthful answer to OP's question.
I'm not saying anybody should die. The commenter is not saying anybody should die. You aren't saying anybody should die, right?
All good? 🤝
That would be only one less hunans.He can do better if he puts his back into it.