Read the comment that started this whole shitshow. That, ultimately, is what you're supporting!
No, ultimately, it isn't.
I think I have a better idea of what I support than you do.
So are you repudiating your previous comments in this thread defending the false characterization of getting stuck in traffic as a "hostage situation" and supporting those who advocated violence against protestors?
Please quote me supporting the comments that advocate such things. Let's see where I did such a thing.
Replying in a comment chain where such things are mentioned does not indicate support.
Are you willing to say "I reject the premise that blocking traffic is a 'hostage situation' and I do not support violence against protestors?"
If you're not willing to say that, well, we know where you stand.
I'm not going to follow your orders, but I already made it very clear that I do not support running over protesters, so I'm not sure why you need me to take your loyalty oath.
https://lemmy.world/comment/9422815
Read the comment that started this whole shitshow. That, ultimately, is what you're supporting!
No, ultimately, it isn't.
I think I have a better idea of what I support than you do.
So are you repudiating your previous comments in this thread defending the false characterization of getting stuck in traffic as a "hostage situation" and supporting those who advocated violence against protestors?
Please quote me supporting the comments that advocate such things. Let's see where I did such a thing.
Replying in a comment chain where such things are mentioned does not indicate support.
Are you willing to say "I reject the premise that blocking traffic is a 'hostage situation' and I do not support violence against protestors?"
If you're not willing to say that, well, we know where you stand.
I'm not going to follow your orders, but I already made it very clear that I do not support running over protesters, so I'm not sure why you need me to take your loyalty oath.