Scarlett Johansson denied OpenAI the right to use her voice. They used it anyway.Wilshire@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.world – 1156 points – 1 months agoboingboing.net184Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsMost of AI just seems to be blatant theft and copyright issues.No, it's only theft when it's poor people doing it. When it's rich people, it's fair use of a publicly available resource.That’s pretty much the whole point. Making use of other people’s work and likeness in a way that removes any obligations you would normally have to those people. Just clearly define “copyright violation” for them, and they’ll craft a method that technically eludes your definition.And traumatizing developing countries labor with what the internet has of most terrible.Not in this case.
Most of AI just seems to be blatant theft and copyright issues.No, it's only theft when it's poor people doing it. When it's rich people, it's fair use of a publicly available resource.That’s pretty much the whole point. Making use of other people’s work and likeness in a way that removes any obligations you would normally have to those people. Just clearly define “copyright violation” for them, and they’ll craft a method that technically eludes your definition.And traumatizing developing countries labor with what the internet has of most terrible.Not in this case.
No, it's only theft when it's poor people doing it. When it's rich people, it's fair use of a publicly available resource.
That’s pretty much the whole point. Making use of other people’s work and likeness in a way that removes any obligations you would normally have to those people. Just clearly define “copyright violation” for them, and they’ll craft a method that technically eludes your definition.
Most of AI just seems to be blatant theft and copyright issues.
No, it's only theft when it's poor people doing it.
When it's rich people, it's fair use of a publicly available resource.
That’s pretty much the whole point.
Making use of other people’s work and likeness in a way that removes any obligations you would normally have to those people.
Just clearly define “copyright violation” for them, and they’ll craft a method that technically eludes your definition.
And traumatizing developing countries labor with what the internet has of most terrible.
Not in this case.