Once again, it’s a false equivalence logical fallacy— neither sugar nor fire are water, and there is no reason to believe they would act like water. Especially considering that water is not wet, it just makes things wet.
This seems to be causing you quite a bit of distress and memory problems. I suggest a rest.
what makes water so special that it absolutely under any circumstances never be compared to anything else? the fact that its wet?
I see you’re still confused. Water isn’t wet; it just makes things wet.
And water isn’t special, either. It can be compared to lots of things— just not falsely, as you have.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
i havent falsely compared water. and i am not confused. it is pretty obvious if youve been around water that it is wet
You falsely compared to water to fire and sugar. Water is neither fire nor sugar. Water has none of the properties of fire nor sugar. You are clearly very confused about what water is and what sugar and fire are.
You blamed your “brain” for this. Repeatedly.
May you and your “brain” have a speedy recovery as you ponder how water is not wet, it just makes other things wet.
you still dont know what a comparison is. and now you make fun of my intellect. you are out of ideas
I’m just illustrating the false equivalencies you made between water, sugar, and fire. Don’t blame me for the things you said.
And the only “idea” I’ve kept repeating is that water is not wet; it just makes things wet.
Insulting me won’t change that.
not false equivalency, comparison. unless you have a comparison in mind
and stop making things up, what insults are you talking about? did your brain make you forget what you just commented?
“Nuh uh!” isn’t a very compelling argument. It seems that you are the one who is out of ideas and whose “brain” keeps forgetting things… weren’t you the one accusing me of projecting? Lol
Water is not wet; it just makes other things wet.
Best of luck with your “brain”!
you just said nuh uh isnt a compelling argument and then just did exactly that LMAO
water is wet because it makes other things wet
you just said nuh uh isnt a compelling argument and then just did exactly that LMAO
I see that your “brain” is still confused, since that’s not what happened. But it’s cute that you think it is. Like how you think sugar and fire are water.
But water isn’t wet; it just makes other things wet.
i actually never said sugar and fire are water. funny how your alleged superior smart brain somehow missed that
but water is wet, because it makes other things wet
funny how your alleged superior smart brain
Now your “brain” seems to be hallucinating, since I never made such a claim. This whole this seems to have really upset you. Perhaps you should take a break and consider how water isn’t wet— it just makes other things wet.
downpunxx@fedia.io to 
Once again, it’s a false equivalence logical fallacy— neither sugar nor fire are water, and there is no reason to believe they would act like water. Especially considering that water is not wet, it just makes things wet.
This seems to be causing you quite a bit of distress and memory problems. I suggest a rest.
what makes water so special that it absolutely under any circumstances never be compared to anything else? the fact that its wet?
I see you’re still confused. Water isn’t wet; it just makes things wet.
And water isn’t special, either. It can be compared to lots of things— just not falsely, as you have.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
i havent falsely compared water. and i am not confused. it is pretty obvious if youve been around water that it is wet
You falsely compared to water to fire and sugar. Water is neither fire nor sugar. Water has none of the properties of fire nor sugar. You are clearly very confused about what water is and what sugar and fire are.
You blamed your “brain” for this. Repeatedly.
May you and your “brain” have a speedy recovery as you ponder how water is not wet, it just makes other things wet.
you still dont know what a comparison is. and now you make fun of my intellect. you are out of ideas
I’m just illustrating the false equivalencies you made between water, sugar, and fire. Don’t blame me for the things you said.
And the only “idea” I’ve kept repeating is that water is not wet; it just makes things wet.
Insulting me won’t change that.
not false equivalency, comparison. unless you have a comparison in mind
and stop making things up, what insults are you talking about? did your brain make you forget what you just commented?
“Nuh uh!” isn’t a very compelling argument. It seems that you are the one who is out of ideas and whose “brain” keeps forgetting things… weren’t you the one accusing me of projecting? Lol
Water is not wet; it just makes other things wet.
Best of luck with your “brain”!
you just said nuh uh isnt a compelling argument and then just did exactly that LMAO
water is wet because it makes other things wet
I see that your “brain” is still confused, since that’s not what happened. But it’s cute that you think it is. Like how you think sugar and fire are water.
But water isn’t wet; it just makes other things wet.
i actually never said sugar and fire are water. funny how your alleged superior smart brain somehow missed that
but water is wet, because it makes other things wet
Now your “brain” seems to be hallucinating, since I never made such a claim. This whole this seems to have really upset you. Perhaps you should take a break and consider how water isn’t wet— it just makes other things wet.