ACLU Warns Trump Win Would Herald 'New Era of Mass Incarceration'jeffw@lemmy.worldmod to News@lemmy.world – 420 points – 2 months agocommondreams.org43Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsToo bad we can’t actually talk about what should happen due to community censorship.The patriotic thing would be to tar and feather politicians per history.I prefer French history.Gotta start somewhereI don't think many people actually survived tarring and feathering. They'd probably have more luck nowadays though.I suppose you’re right. Those burns would be pretty bad. I forgot tar would be HOT.Here you are, saying things.... 🤷♂️I’ve said nothing.Try saying something then?I wouldn’t want to break any rules.Which rules? Rules 1-7 are only about posts and I'm sure you could make your point without using a url shortener.If you’re being cryptic about the url shortener, I’m afraid it went over my head.No, I was speculating on what rule you were thinking you would be breaking.“Inciting violence” or “celebrating violence”
Too bad we can’t actually talk about what should happen due to community censorship.The patriotic thing would be to tar and feather politicians per history.I prefer French history.Gotta start somewhereI don't think many people actually survived tarring and feathering. They'd probably have more luck nowadays though.I suppose you’re right. Those burns would be pretty bad. I forgot tar would be HOT.Here you are, saying things.... 🤷♂️I’ve said nothing.Try saying something then?I wouldn’t want to break any rules.Which rules? Rules 1-7 are only about posts and I'm sure you could make your point without using a url shortener.If you’re being cryptic about the url shortener, I’m afraid it went over my head.No, I was speculating on what rule you were thinking you would be breaking.“Inciting violence” or “celebrating violence”
The patriotic thing would be to tar and feather politicians per history.I prefer French history.Gotta start somewhereI don't think many people actually survived tarring and feathering. They'd probably have more luck nowadays though.I suppose you’re right. Those burns would be pretty bad. I forgot tar would be HOT.
I prefer French history.Gotta start somewhereI don't think many people actually survived tarring and feathering. They'd probably have more luck nowadays though.I suppose you’re right. Those burns would be pretty bad. I forgot tar would be HOT.
I don't think many people actually survived tarring and feathering. They'd probably have more luck nowadays though.I suppose you’re right. Those burns would be pretty bad. I forgot tar would be HOT.
Here you are, saying things.... 🤷♂️I’ve said nothing.Try saying something then?I wouldn’t want to break any rules.Which rules? Rules 1-7 are only about posts and I'm sure you could make your point without using a url shortener.If you’re being cryptic about the url shortener, I’m afraid it went over my head.No, I was speculating on what rule you were thinking you would be breaking.“Inciting violence” or “celebrating violence”
I’ve said nothing.Try saying something then?I wouldn’t want to break any rules.Which rules? Rules 1-7 are only about posts and I'm sure you could make your point without using a url shortener.If you’re being cryptic about the url shortener, I’m afraid it went over my head.No, I was speculating on what rule you were thinking you would be breaking.“Inciting violence” or “celebrating violence”
Try saying something then?I wouldn’t want to break any rules.Which rules? Rules 1-7 are only about posts and I'm sure you could make your point without using a url shortener.If you’re being cryptic about the url shortener, I’m afraid it went over my head.No, I was speculating on what rule you were thinking you would be breaking.“Inciting violence” or “celebrating violence”
I wouldn’t want to break any rules.Which rules? Rules 1-7 are only about posts and I'm sure you could make your point without using a url shortener.If you’re being cryptic about the url shortener, I’m afraid it went over my head.No, I was speculating on what rule you were thinking you would be breaking.“Inciting violence” or “celebrating violence”
Which rules? Rules 1-7 are only about posts and I'm sure you could make your point without using a url shortener.If you’re being cryptic about the url shortener, I’m afraid it went over my head.No, I was speculating on what rule you were thinking you would be breaking.“Inciting violence” or “celebrating violence”
If you’re being cryptic about the url shortener, I’m afraid it went over my head.No, I was speculating on what rule you were thinking you would be breaking.“Inciting violence” or “celebrating violence”
No, I was speculating on what rule you were thinking you would be breaking.“Inciting violence” or “celebrating violence”
Too bad we can’t actually talk about what should happen due to community censorship.
The patriotic thing would be to tar and feather politicians per history.
I prefer French history.
Gotta start somewhere
I don't think many people actually survived tarring and feathering. They'd probably have more luck nowadays though.
I suppose you’re right. Those burns would be pretty bad. I forgot tar would be HOT.
Here you are, saying things.... 🤷♂️
I’ve said nothing.
Try saying something then?
I wouldn’t want to break any rules.
Which rules? Rules 1-7 are only about posts and I'm sure you could make your point without using a url shortener.
If you’re being cryptic about the url shortener, I’m afraid it went over my head.
No, I was speculating on what rule you were thinking you would be breaking.
“Inciting violence” or “celebrating violence”