What opinions do you have that you consider (shallow && pedantic)?

cheese_greater@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world – 94 points –

On accident

I kind of can't take people seriously when they say On accident, I don't know or care if its more or less grammatical, it sounds like a child sputtering in my mind. It should be By accident or accidentally

Tummy

Any adult has zero business saying this lol

180

You are viewing a single comment

Ha! How much time have you got?

Shallow and pedantic is my speciality.

But for the sake of brevity I'll simply say that hearing (or reading) less in cases where fewer would be more appropriate is like driving an ice pick into my brain.

Yes...both are technically correct, but I have to fight the urge to be that guy whenever I hear it.

They're not interchangeable. 'Fewer' is for countable nouns and 'less' is for aggregate nouns, just like 'how many' and 'how much'.

E.g:

Aggregate:

"How much sand? Less sand."

Countable:

"How many grains of sand? Fewer grains of sand."

Along with that, I'll add in "number" vs "amount":

  • A shocking number of people get this wrong (countable)
  • The amount of confusion about it is distressing (aggregate)

Oh believe me, I know. I agree.

but the argument nowadays is that common usage dictates that both are now "acceptable", similar to how apparently "literally" now effectively means "figuratively" because everyone uses it.

We don’t have to accept it.

My stupid mental trick for keeping these straight: fewer potatoes means less mashed potatoes.

Less could historically be used in any case and still can today. The distinction was first suggested by a guy a couple hundred years ago.

2 more...