YouTube creator sues Nvidia and OpenAI for ‘unjust enrichment’ for using their videos for AI trainingvegeta@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.world – 608 points – 3 months agotomshardware.com107Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all comments"the only people that should be getting unjustly rich off of other peoples created content are us" ~ alphabet/google/youtubeThe intense hatred for "stealing" content might be blunted if all the subsequent work product goes to the public domain. But what do you do when you start getting copywrite struck on your own works, because someone else decided to steal it and claim ownership?My guy that already happens. Didn't you see the hbomberguy video?I have not, but I've heard rumors of it happening.I didn't hear or see. Do you have a link, or care to elaborate?Well i didn't really want to but just for you, Skaffi, I looked it up on YouTube and copied the link https://youtu.be/yDp3cB5fHXQ?si=uZD_kFQFQFEqEiWoPeople talk about open source models, but there's no such thing. They are all black boxes where you have no idea what went into them. People talk about open source models, but there’s no such thing. :-/ Source code isn't real? Schematics and blue prints don't exist?Training data is the source. Not the 20 lines of python that get supplied with a model.They guy you're responding to is clueless as to how this actually works.The intense hatred for "stealing" content might be blunted if all the subsequent work product goes to the public domain Fun fact...It does!In about 100 years, sure.It's hilarious people like you pretend you can't train an LLM just like opening did or anyone else does. Why lie about this as if it's not available to everyone to use?
"the only people that should be getting unjustly rich off of other peoples created content are us" ~ alphabet/google/youtubeThe intense hatred for "stealing" content might be blunted if all the subsequent work product goes to the public domain. But what do you do when you start getting copywrite struck on your own works, because someone else decided to steal it and claim ownership?My guy that already happens. Didn't you see the hbomberguy video?I have not, but I've heard rumors of it happening.I didn't hear or see. Do you have a link, or care to elaborate?Well i didn't really want to but just for you, Skaffi, I looked it up on YouTube and copied the link https://youtu.be/yDp3cB5fHXQ?si=uZD_kFQFQFEqEiWoPeople talk about open source models, but there's no such thing. They are all black boxes where you have no idea what went into them. People talk about open source models, but there’s no such thing. :-/ Source code isn't real? Schematics and blue prints don't exist?Training data is the source. Not the 20 lines of python that get supplied with a model.They guy you're responding to is clueless as to how this actually works.The intense hatred for "stealing" content might be blunted if all the subsequent work product goes to the public domain Fun fact...It does!In about 100 years, sure.It's hilarious people like you pretend you can't train an LLM just like opening did or anyone else does. Why lie about this as if it's not available to everyone to use?
The intense hatred for "stealing" content might be blunted if all the subsequent work product goes to the public domain. But what do you do when you start getting copywrite struck on your own works, because someone else decided to steal it and claim ownership?My guy that already happens. Didn't you see the hbomberguy video?I have not, but I've heard rumors of it happening.I didn't hear or see. Do you have a link, or care to elaborate?Well i didn't really want to but just for you, Skaffi, I looked it up on YouTube and copied the link https://youtu.be/yDp3cB5fHXQ?si=uZD_kFQFQFEqEiWoPeople talk about open source models, but there's no such thing. They are all black boxes where you have no idea what went into them. People talk about open source models, but there’s no such thing. :-/ Source code isn't real? Schematics and blue prints don't exist?Training data is the source. Not the 20 lines of python that get supplied with a model.They guy you're responding to is clueless as to how this actually works.The intense hatred for "stealing" content might be blunted if all the subsequent work product goes to the public domain Fun fact...It does!In about 100 years, sure.
My guy that already happens. Didn't you see the hbomberguy video?I have not, but I've heard rumors of it happening.I didn't hear or see. Do you have a link, or care to elaborate?Well i didn't really want to but just for you, Skaffi, I looked it up on YouTube and copied the link https://youtu.be/yDp3cB5fHXQ?si=uZD_kFQFQFEqEiWo
I didn't hear or see. Do you have a link, or care to elaborate?Well i didn't really want to but just for you, Skaffi, I looked it up on YouTube and copied the link https://youtu.be/yDp3cB5fHXQ?si=uZD_kFQFQFEqEiWo
Well i didn't really want to but just for you, Skaffi, I looked it up on YouTube and copied the link https://youtu.be/yDp3cB5fHXQ?si=uZD_kFQFQFEqEiWo
People talk about open source models, but there's no such thing. They are all black boxes where you have no idea what went into them. People talk about open source models, but there’s no such thing. :-/ Source code isn't real? Schematics and blue prints don't exist?Training data is the source. Not the 20 lines of python that get supplied with a model.They guy you're responding to is clueless as to how this actually works.
People talk about open source models, but there’s no such thing. :-/ Source code isn't real? Schematics and blue prints don't exist?Training data is the source. Not the 20 lines of python that get supplied with a model.They guy you're responding to is clueless as to how this actually works.
The intense hatred for "stealing" content might be blunted if all the subsequent work product goes to the public domain Fun fact...It does!In about 100 years, sure.
It's hilarious people like you pretend you can't train an LLM just like opening did or anyone else does. Why lie about this as if it's not available to everyone to use?
"the only people that should be getting unjustly rich off of other peoples created content are us" ~ alphabet/google/youtube
The intense hatred for "stealing" content might be blunted if all the subsequent work product goes to the public domain.
But what do you do when you start getting copywrite struck on your own works, because someone else decided to steal it and claim ownership?
My guy that already happens. Didn't you see the hbomberguy video?
I have not, but I've heard rumors of it happening.
I didn't hear or see. Do you have a link, or care to elaborate?
Well i didn't really want to but just for you, Skaffi, I looked it up on YouTube and copied the link
https://youtu.be/yDp3cB5fHXQ?si=uZD_kFQFQFEqEiWo
People talk about open source models, but there's no such thing. They are all black boxes where you have no idea what went into them.
:-/
Source code isn't real? Schematics and blue prints don't exist?
Training data is the source. Not the 20 lines of python that get supplied with a model.
They guy you're responding to is clueless as to how this actually works.
The intense hatred for "stealing" content might be blunted if all the subsequent work product goes to the public domain
Fun fact...It does!
In about 100 years, sure.
It's hilarious people like you pretend you can't train an LLM just like opening did or anyone else does.
Why lie about this as if it's not available to everyone to use?