When asked if she felt it was wrong, she said, “Absolutely, yes. It was wrong, it was a criminal act, it’s a violation of international law.”
From your link.
That has nothing to do with her supporting his positions and blaming the U.S.... which she does.
That has nothing to do with her supporting his positions
When asked if she felt it was wrong, she said, “Absolutely, yes. It was wrong, it was a criminal act, it’s a violation of international law.” From your video link.
Doesn't sound like she is supporting his decision. Especially since she literally said she thinks it's wrong.
The russianphobia in this place is blinding.
I didn't say she supports his decision, I said she supports his positions. I think you are purposely trying to avoid that. She blames the U.S. for the invasion and agrees with Putin on how dangerous NATO "expansion" is. The last countries near Russia that joined NATO were in 2004. Russira is committing a genocide and invaded for no reason. Russia phobia is completely understandable.
I said she supports his positions. I think you are purposely trying to avoid that.
And I think you are purposely exaggerating about her positions because you think she is taking votes away from Harris.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn't align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
Well if she didn't admit to being a foreign asset, we know for sure she cannot possibly be! /s
You have a history you seem proud of where you are unwilling to comprehend consequences. When 2 people are fighting each other and you step up and hold their arms behind them so the other can take free wacks, who do you support?
BuT yOu DiDn'T SAY yOu SuPpOrT tHe OtHeR gUy... in what world does that matter?
You have a history you seem proud of where you are unwilling to comprehend consequences.
Thanks for being interested enough in me to worry about my "history." I don't have to prove anything to you. I disagree with you. You disagree with me. And that's ok.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn't align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
'Interested' is not the word I would use. We've had a couple conversations (I'm not fooled by the name change) where you systematically refuse to integrate information that contradicts your world view and follow up with nonsense copypasta as if that somehow absolves you of any obligation to improve.
The issue isn't the news organization. It's you refusing to concede she parrots Russian rhetoric and takes their side with the Ukraine conflict despite conceding it is an illegal war. Her tap dancing around it to not openly admit she is Putin's plant is your ONLY response. You do not provide any rebuttal other than "I am not convinced". "Reach out to the news organization"? Are they going to find where you live, bury you in a pile of Stein quotes of her spouting russian talking points while playing a video of RT broadcasting the same thing until you finally admit "OMG EVIDENCE MATTERS"? No? Then why bother?
So spare me your BS copypasta deflecting any responsibility and actually contribute something of value to the conversation. Can you find a contradictory quote from Stein where she declares the 'peace plan' she intends for Ukraine listed in her platform commits to pre-2014 Ukraine borders? If you can't, then admit she is anti-Ukraine/pro-Russian and stop defending her with vapour.
(I’m not fooled by the name change)
What do you mean? The name change isn't for "fooling" anyone. When I update my "display name" the names get updated to all my past posts. So there is not "fooling" anyone.
And I have the same username, I haven't changed my username, so not sure what you mean by not being fooled by a name change. My entire post and comment history is public.
you systematically refuse to integrate information that contradicts your world view
OR maybe I just haven't changed my mind or my opinion.
You haven't changed your opinion about voting for harris. Does that mean you "you systematically refuse to integrate information that contradicts your world view"?
Her tap dancing around it to not openly admit she is Putin’s plant
Exactly. She's never said it. I don't belive she is. Let it go. You have your opinion, I have mine. I respect your opinion. Respect mine.
You do not provide any rebuttal other than “I am not convinced”.
I am under no obligation to provide any rebuttal or prove anything to you. I gave you my opinion. Accept it or not. Not my problem.
Also, I'm not even voting for Jill Stein, so calm down.
It does not matter who you claim you are or are not voting for. You defend her. With nothing but blind stubbornness. Still haven't rebutted the fact she has pro-Russian stances. Just more head in the sand.
I don't have to prove anything to you. I told you my opinion. You can accept or not. I don't care.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn't align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators--they have removed articles that don't fit in the community. Thank you!
Any links to Stein saying she supports Russian terrorism? I'm not voting for her, but I've never heard her say this.
She won't say the words "I support Putin's positions". She will just SUPPORT those positions.
If she's never said it, then I don't believe it. Sorry, friend.
You don't believe she supports Putin's positions even when she says she supports those positions herself? Mkay
Has she said it? What Putin positions does she support?
Few seconds on Google would tell you but here
https://www.instagram.com/p/C-qXXvet419/?locale=en_US%2Cen_US
When asked if she felt it was wrong, she said, “Absolutely, yes. It was wrong, it was a criminal act, it’s a violation of international law.”
From your link.
That has nothing to do with her supporting his positions and blaming the U.S.... which she does.
When asked if she felt it was wrong, she said, “Absolutely, yes. It was wrong, it was a criminal act, it’s a violation of international law.” From your video link.
Doesn't sound like she is supporting his decision. Especially since she literally said she thinks it's wrong.
The russianphobia in this place is blinding.
I didn't say she supports his decision, I said she supports his positions. I think you are purposely trying to avoid that. She blames the U.S. for the invasion and agrees with Putin on how dangerous NATO "expansion" is. The last countries near Russia that joined NATO were in 2004. Russira is committing a genocide and invaded for no reason. Russia phobia is completely understandable.
And I think you are purposely exaggerating about her positions because you think she is taking votes away from Harris.
Where has she said "I support Putin"?
It's in the spoiler I already posted.
She never said she supported Putin.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn't align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
Well if she didn't admit to being a foreign asset, we know for sure she cannot possibly be! /s
It's literally in her party platform:
Stop fueling the war between Russia and Ukraine and lead on negotiating a peaceful end
Without US/Nato (which she also intends on disbanding) support Ukraine's peace is subjugation. Period.
"Every moron in the Green Party needs to remember the company that Jill Stein keeps," Christopher David said.
None of that says she "supports Putin" though.
You have a history you seem proud of where you are unwilling to comprehend consequences. When 2 people are fighting each other and you step up and hold their arms behind them so the other can take free wacks, who do you support?
BuT yOu DiDn'T SAY yOu SuPpOrT tHe OtHeR gUy... in what world does that matter?
Thanks for being interested enough in me to worry about my "history." I don't have to prove anything to you. I disagree with you. You disagree with me. And that's ok.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn't align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
'Interested' is not the word I would use. We've had a couple conversations (I'm not fooled by the name change) where you systematically refuse to integrate information that contradicts your world view and follow up with nonsense copypasta as if that somehow absolves you of any obligation to improve.
The issue isn't the news organization. It's you refusing to concede she parrots Russian rhetoric and takes their side with the Ukraine conflict despite conceding it is an illegal war. Her tap dancing around it to not openly admit she is Putin's plant is your ONLY response. You do not provide any rebuttal other than "I am not convinced". "Reach out to the news organization"? Are they going to find where you live, bury you in a pile of Stein quotes of her spouting russian talking points while playing a video of RT broadcasting the same thing until you finally admit "OMG EVIDENCE MATTERS"? No? Then why bother?
So spare me your BS copypasta deflecting any responsibility and actually contribute something of value to the conversation. Can you find a contradictory quote from Stein where she declares the 'peace plan' she intends for Ukraine listed in her platform commits to pre-2014 Ukraine borders? If you can't, then admit she is anti-Ukraine/pro-Russian and stop defending her with vapour.
What do you mean? The name change isn't for "fooling" anyone. When I update my "display name" the names get updated to all my past posts. So there is not "fooling" anyone.
And I have the same username, I haven't changed my username, so not sure what you mean by not being fooled by a name change. My entire post and comment history is public.
OR maybe I just haven't changed my mind or my opinion.
You haven't changed your opinion about voting for harris. Does that mean you "you systematically refuse to integrate information that contradicts your world view"?
Exactly. She's never said it. I don't belive she is. Let it go. You have your opinion, I have mine. I respect your opinion. Respect mine.
I am under no obligation to provide any rebuttal or prove anything to you. I gave you my opinion. Accept it or not. Not my problem.
Also, I'm not even voting for Jill Stein, so calm down.
It does not matter who you claim you are or are not voting for. You defend her. With nothing but blind stubbornness. Still haven't rebutted the fact she has pro-Russian stances. Just more head in the sand.
I don't have to prove anything to you. I told you my opinion. You can accept or not. I don't care.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn't align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators--they have removed articles that don't fit in the community. Thank you!