You lose all credibility when you say things like that. Try disagreeing without name-calling.
He followed up with evidence, and you're crying about name calling, which wasn't even towards you. Disingenuous as usual.
I didn't say he called me names. But he called Jill Stein, "Putin’s Jizz Stein." What "evidence" is there to call her Jizz Stein? That's name-calling, friend. And uncalled for.
One can produce "evidence" and an argument, without resorting to name-calling. I stand by what I said. Thank you!
So by doubling down are you willing to actually stand by it and take the bet? Tell you what. I'm so confident you're wrong that I'll give you an hour from the posting of this to craft a full on dissertation on why you think Stein is teh best candidate. You can edit your first reply to that dissertation, I'll screenshot it and put it in here to make it concrete and official and we'll let the 2 posts see who wins the credibility contest.
You willing to stand by your opinion or are you just bluster?
I'm not even voting for Jill Stein, friend.
Also, I don't have to explain myself to you at all. About anything.
You lose all credibility when you say things like, "Putin’s Jizz Stein." Try disagreeing without name-calling.
Seeing as we're friends, I'll share with you my favourite Shakespear quote:
"Cowards die many times before their deaths. The brave taste of death but once." (Julius Caesar, Act 2 Scene 2)
Tell that to all* the voters who claim they would vote for someone else, "but can't let tfg win!"
Cool story, bro. I don't have to explain myself to you at all.
And I'm not even voting for Jill Stein.
You really do need to explain yourself if you want to come in here and try to shill for a russian asset. For someone who continually claims to "not be voting for Jill Stein" you certainly seem to be taking every opportunity to post about her. I guess it keeps you off the front lines though.
You really do need to explain yourself
Actually, no. No, I don't.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn't align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
For someone who continually claims to "not be voting for Jill Stein" you certainly seem to be taking every opportunity to post about her.
I don't have to explain my actions to you. I didn't write the article.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn't align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
No need to explain yourself to me. But since you’re “not voting for Jill Stein” yet continually post articles about her, it would perhaps be beneficial, not for me but for this community in general, to understand what your motivation is in that regard.
to understand what your motivation is in that regard.
I don't have to explain anything to you.
No need to explain yourself to me. But since you’re “not voting for Jill Stein” yet continually post articles about her, it would perhaps be beneficial, not for me but for this community in general, to understand what your motivation is in that regard.
You lose all credibility when you say things like that. Try disagreeing without name-calling.
He followed up with evidence, and you're crying about name calling, which wasn't even towards you. Disingenuous as usual.
I didn't say he called me names. But he called Jill Stein, "Putin’s Jizz Stein." What "evidence" is there to call her Jizz Stein? That's name-calling, friend. And uncalled for.
One can produce "evidence" and an argument, without resorting to name-calling. I stand by what I said. Thank you!
So by doubling down are you willing to actually stand by it and take the bet? Tell you what. I'm so confident you're wrong that I'll give you an hour from the posting of this to craft a full on dissertation on why you think Stein is teh best candidate. You can edit your first reply to that dissertation, I'll screenshot it and put it in here to make it concrete and official and we'll let the 2 posts see who wins the credibility contest.
You willing to stand by your opinion or are you just bluster?
I'm not even voting for Jill Stein, friend.
Also, I don't have to explain myself to you at all. About anything.
You lose all credibility when you say things like, "Putin’s Jizz Stein." Try disagreeing without name-calling.
Seeing as we're friends, I'll share with you my favourite Shakespear quote:
"Cowards die many times before their deaths. The brave taste of death but once." (Julius Caesar, Act 2 Scene 2)
Tell that to all* the voters who claim they would vote for someone else, "but can't let tfg win!"
Cool story, bro. I don't have to explain myself to you at all.
And I'm not even voting for Jill Stein.
You really do need to explain yourself if you want to come in here and try to shill for a russian asset. For someone who continually claims to "not be voting for Jill Stein" you certainly seem to be taking every opportunity to post about her. I guess it keeps you off the front lines though.
Actually, no. No, I don't.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn't align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
For someone who continually claims to "not be voting for Jill Stein" you certainly seem to be taking every opportunity to post about her.
I don't have to explain my actions to you. I didn't write the article.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn't align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
No need to explain yourself to me. But since you’re “not voting for Jill Stein” yet continually post articles about her, it would perhaps be beneficial, not for me but for this community in general, to understand what your motivation is in that regard.
I don't have to explain anything to you.
No need to explain yourself to me. But since you’re “not voting for Jill Stein” yet continually post articles about her, it would perhaps be beneficial, not for me but for this community in general, to understand what your motivation is in that regard.
I don't have to explain anything to you. Thanks.
This you?