Subscription models for an app that’s not hosting anything is just the dev wanting a constant revenue stream, no matter how they try to word it.

spiritedpause@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy@lemmy.ml – 25 points –

Subscription models only make sense for an app/service that have recurring costs. In the case of Lemmy apps, the instances are the ones with recurring hosting costs, not the apps.

If an app doesn’t have recurring hosting costs, it only makes sense to have one up front payment and then maybe in app purchases to pay for new features going forward

81

You are viewing a single comment

Then don't. Free version barely has any ads and has 99% of the functionality. Y'all a bunch of babies.

I’m not talking about this one specific application. I’m talking about the trend that everything is taking.

One thing in isolation isn’t bad. “ItS oNlY $xx.99/yr” after all.

But when stepping back and looking at the trend you see a different story.
It’s only $10
It’s only $15
It’s only $30
It’s only $5
It’s only $50
It’s only $100
It’s only $60
It’s only $3
It’s only $1599
It’s only $130
It’s only $45
It’s only $99
It’s only $200
It’s only…

You can use interest rates to convert between stocks and flows of money. If the prevailing interest rate is 5%, a thing will produce 5%, or 1/20th, of its actual value every year. So you can take the annual cost of something and multiply by 20 (and vigorously wave your hands at compounding) to get its actual value.

A $10/month subscription costs $120/year, or $2,400 over 20 years. So it's equivalent to a $2,400 purchase.

You can also think of it as, you need to set aside $2,400 in investments to pay for your subscription, e.g. in retirement. Or, if you ditched your subscription you could afford to borrow $2,400 more to e.g. buy a house. Or, you as a customer are the same value to the business as $2,400 in capital, minus whatever they have to spend to make the thing.

You should think a lot about a $2,400 purchase.

Exactly, and that's why I dropped Amazon Prime and most other subscriptions.

Yeah, packages taking a few days longer is annoying, but I also don't feel obligated to keep shopping at Amazon to "get my value." I miss some shows, but I can buy them for less than the yearly cost of the subscription, and most can be replaced with content at other services.

I still have two streaming subscriptions: Netflix (kids love it, I watch it while folding laundry) and Disney+ (wife and one kid loves it). I spend $20/month total for both (have discount for D+ through credit card for the legacy plan, so it's like $7-8 net), and neither have ads.

And that's pretty much it for subscriptions. Sure, I have my city utilities and whatnot, but those aren't really optional unless I'm willing to go off-grid, and from my math it would take many years to pay off (not sure it will depending on how markets go), and I'd likely have a worse experience.

Other services:

  • Spotify - I buy what I want, and YouTube + ad blocker for one-offs
  • Audible/Kindle - local library
  • apps - haven't found anything that I can't replace with open source apps
  • gym - I have a municipal gym that I pay for yearly, no auto-renew; it has a pool as well that we use enough to be cheaper than the daily rate, so I see it as a bulk discount, not a subscription
  • gaming - I buy games as needed, most of them on discount/bundles
  • food delivery - I pay for Costco, but we do most of our shopping there and it's way more convenient than other discount stores (e.g. WinCo/Aldi); we save far more than we pay for it, so the $130 or whatever we spend for the membership is nothing vs the value we get
  • phone - we're on no-contract phones, and for two lines, we pay $30-ish/month; my wife is on Mint ($15-20/month), and I'm on Tello (~$10/month); we buy phones outright (wife has iPhone 11 I got for $500, mine is usually $200-300 every 2-3 years)
  • Patreon/Twitch - I don't have any, but I do donate/buy merch from time to time to support my favorite creators (usually smaller, I don't donate to any larger orgs)

We just got two cats, so maybe I'll end up getting a Chewy membership or something, but we'll try to avoid that.

Reoccurring bills are also subscriptions. Like rent, food, electricity, gas, water, etc.

I guess, but they're a lot less optional and more useful.

I own my house, so I don't pay rent. My mortgage is below inflation and expected investment returns (it's even below risk free investments like CDs), so I actually make money by not paying it down.

Replacing gas/water/electricity/food with fixed cost items is more expensive. Electricity is the easiest, and going off-grid would cost $20-30k initially with a really good deal (assuming I DIY a lot of it; a lot of this is the battery backup), which if invested in the market would yield $1200-1600 the first year @ 6%. I only pay $50-100/month for electricity, so I'd pay more to generate it myself vs investing that money. The same goes for gas, water, and food, mostly because of the land requirement (need trees for heat, large plots for growing for, well access, etc). These items benefit from economies of scale, so it's absolutely worth paying based on use.

So it goes both ways. Some subscription-type things are cheaper long term, such as a Costco subscription or natural gas delivery, and some are likely more expensive, like paying for heated seats or many streaming subscriptions.

Microtransactions started with horse armor in oblivion. The fact that people can't see the clear trend with things like this is directly one of the causes of constant enshitification

5 more...
5 more...