He's commenting on the fact that "taking" something implies the other party doesn't necessarily consent, which is probably why nobody says "taking head" they say "getting head" or "receiving oral/bj/whatever" so the consent isn't ambiguous.
He's commenting on how the observational humor and irreverent tone of OP's post was met with such a direct hard turn. Not a bad shit post and the bruh what was perfect.
Sort of like if Cramer bust into the apartment with a laugh track and then dropped the n word. And Jerry was like, let's get coffee in a car in like 20 years.
Receiving
Taking head is called raping someone
Bruh what?
He's commenting on the fact that "taking" something implies the other party doesn't necessarily consent, which is probably why nobody says "taking head" they say "getting head" or "receiving oral/bj/whatever" so the consent isn't ambiguous.
He's commenting on how the observational humor and irreverent tone of OP's post was met with such a direct hard turn. Not a bad shit post and the bruh what was perfect.
Sort of like if Cramer bust into the apartment with a laugh track and then dropped the n word. And Jerry was like, let's get coffee in a car in like 20 years.
You’re OP…
He's confused
Head is given, not taken.
It’s six words. Which ones do you not understand?
true but not funny
No idea why that would read as funny.