Run assembly scripts from your terminal without compiling

sebastiancarlos@lemmy.sdf.org to Linux@lemmy.ml – 39 points – Assembly scripts - The FASTEST shell scripts! #bash #commandline
youtube.com

Source code:

#!/usr/bin/env bash

# runasm - Assemble, link, and run multiple assembly files, then delete them.
if [[ $# -eq 0 ]]; then
    echo "Usage: runasm  [ ...]"
    echo "  - Assemble, link, and run multiple assembly files, then delete them."
    echo "  - Name of executable is the name of the first file without extension."
    exit 1
fi

object_files=()
executable_file=${1%.*}

for assembly_file in "$@"; do
    # Avengers, assemble!
    object_file="${assembly_file%.*}.o"
    as "${assembly_file}" -o "${object_file}"
    if [[ $? -ne 0 ]]; then
        exit 1
    fi
    object_files+=("${object_file}")
done

# Link
ld "${object_files[@]}" -o "${executable_file}"
if [[ $? -ne 0 ]]; then
    exit 1
fi

# Run, remove created files, and return exit code
./"${executable_file}"
exit_code=$?
rm "${object_files[@]}" "${executable_file}" > /dev/null 2>&1
exit "${exit_code}"
10

I have two reactions: 1. The headline is rather silly. 2. There's no way this little script, although it might conceivably be useful to someone, needs to be a youtube video.

Isn't the whole point of assembly that there is no compiler?

I mean they're not wrong...

This is why my next book will be titled "how to cook dinner without a compiler, GCC 4 to GCC 11 compatible!"

Putting aside the misleading title...

Because this writes to and then runs an executable file with a known name, this script should never be used on a multiuser system in a directory where another user has write permissions. It is vulnerable to a timing attack where the attacker copies an executable they want run with your permissions between this script creating the file and running it.

I'm still super confused by this user's posts lol. I get that (some? most?) of it is satire... but then why all social media engagement farming hashtag nonsense? Or is this all part of the satire...?

Perhaps we should reconsider the definition of write-only scripts.