Ubuntu minimum requirements

dis_honestfamiliar@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.ml – 1 points –

Anyone know minimum requirements to run Ubuntu. The main flavor as well as any other you want to share. Also, suggest any other distrio for a 15 year old laptop. Thanks.

9

I've been running Void on a dual core Atom with 1862mb of ram. It won't play 1080p video but it will browse the web fine.

I dropped my laptop (couple years old) and it is basically unusable. So, I'm looking to revive my really old laptop (15 year old).

For those asking specs. I think the hard drive has issues so I'm going to replace with ssd. The laptop came with windows 7 32 bit. So, because it came with windows 7 32 bit, the manufacturer says that it has max memory of 8GB. I know I putted 2X4GB sticks in it last time I used it which was 4 years ago. I'm not sure if the chipset supports 64 bit. Also, if I remember correctly, CPU was like first gen i3 with 1.8 or maybe just maybe 2.Something GHz and with like 3GHz turbo.

Thanks everyone. I might try Ubuntu, but most likely, I'll go with Lubuntu, Xubuntu or Ubuntu with Mate. And, I will use it for some light coding and web surfing.

32bit Windows only supports 4GB without PAE enabled, so the manufacturer would/should have said 4GB max. Most 32bit distros ship with PAE enabled so it doesn't care, however some distros like Ubuntu don't ship 32bit anymore, but there's some other good suggestions in the thread.

A lot of it will come down to what you're running for a desktop environment and software. I've got an old laptop with a duel core 2Ghz (x86_64) processor and 2G of ram, and running Debian with XFCE it can do basic web browsing, video playing/streaming up to ~720p, game emulators, etc with the same snappiness as a normal computer.

Ubuntu is a bit bulkier than Debian and some other Debian derivatives, so if you go with Ubuntu you'd probably make sure to go with a more lightweight 'flavor' with a non-gnome desktop and remove anything you don't need.

Alpine and Puppy Linux are two other super lightweight distros that also might be worth checking out (albeit Alpine being a little more advanced and Puppy Linux being a bit limited).

For anyone wondering on update on this. So I install Ubuntu. As you guys know, it is 64 bit only. I was 50/50 expecting it to fail. It installed fine. I checked the specs. Intel i3 2.2GHz 8GB and 64 bit architecture. I just couldn't remember if it was Intel 64 bit or not. Anyway, it installed fine.

However, I did not like that I was forced to snapd. I tried to remove it, and played with Ubuntu a bit. After an hour so I came back to re-read comments on other suggested distros. In looked up install arch on YouTube. I saw that I could use archinstall so I did. Currently looking at what desktop environment I should use.

I'm not a Linux noob. I just didn't know the Ubuntu requirements. And also, I've been comfortably been using Fedora in my main desktop. I just wanted something different on this old old laptop. Thank you all for the comments. And specially for the recommendation give.

I hope you have ssd and maxed out ram. 15 years is Core2Duo right?

Try HaikuOS, KolibriOS and the third option could be Ubuntu or Kubuntu. I'm sure Gnome and Kde will run just fine, but lxqt is marketed as the ost lighweight Linux DE.

But try Haiku and Kolibri for real even they don't run on Linux Kernel.

4gb is not enough lmao

I'd say go with opensuse tumbleweed/stable if you have ram

Arch+lxde if you do not.

If you want even better options, they exist.