New restrictions placed on Xiaomi's bootloader unlocking process
androidauthority.com
Seems like Xiaomi is heavily clamping down on bootloader unlocking in China. Global versions also have a new restriction: no updates without locked bootloader.
Seems like Xiaomi is heavily clamping down on bootloader unlocking in China. Global versions also have a new restriction: no updates without locked bootloader.
I've been a huge fan of Xiaomi for years, but it feels like they're going down the pan.
I'm a bit confused, I thought it was normal and expected for phones to not get live ROM updates anymore after the bootloader is unlocked. The main reason being that the phone would not be able to verify anymore that the update is genuine.
That's foul, I was considering getting a Poco Flagship for my next phone. Though I guess if you manage to unlock the bootloader and run a custom rom, perhaps it doesn't matter as much if you don't get "HyperOS" updates?
This doesn't really bode well for Xiaomi's future though.
Why is this a big deal? It's their call whether to support bootloader unlocked devices on official software. If they're not preventing unlocking this article isn't saying anything newsworthy.
Point is, there are now strict restrictions that weren't there before, like the fact that you need to request permission to unlock bootloader on their forum. That process would require you to reach 'level five' on their forum, among other things. Some articles report having to verify your real name and a mandatory 15-minute survey. And it's not even guaranteed either, they can reject your request for bootloader unlock. Even when granted, the permission will expire after one year. That's what's happening on the Chinese versions. Global users will have to stand by for upcoming changes. IMO, it is a big deal because this is an anti-consumer move, a move that would alienate their core user base, tech enthusiasts looking for cheap devices that they can easily modify.
Locked bootloaders should be banned
I get what you mean, and I agree with you. But locked bootloaders can be good for security, but as long as they're unlockable they are good for freedom. You mean to say un-unlockable bootloaders should be banned.
For real. I've been hunting for a cheap unlocked device for a project in working on. Harder than I thought.
We need to get unlocked bootloaders covered under right to repair laws.
That's pretty fucking wild, it's like the illusion of choice. Like staying in jail, or going out free, but to do so, you have to reach Mount Everest without a Sherpa.
It's really making me consider sticking with Google for my next phone.
I'd classify that as preventing unlocking then.
This is coersion and you know it