So the Wuhan lab was creating genetically modified coronaviruses, it was having issues ignoring safety protocols, it was aware that staff members became sick with symptoms later associated with COVID-19, and there is disagreement in the US government about what the collected data means, but thanks to this article, we can definitively conclude that COVID-19 didn’t leak from that lab. Riiiiiiiiiiight.
So the article says it's inconclusive. Then you claim the article says there is a conclusion, and then claim you don't believe that conclusion.
Does that make no sense to anyone else?
i am sure that is exactly what they discovered... /s
ITT: people who don't understand the concept of ' inconclusive'.
Never heard of upi.com. But I‘m from Germany. Is this a good source?
Very.
I have never heard of upi.com either, but there are credible news outlets also covering this such as BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66005240
So the Wuhan lab was creating genetically modified coronaviruses, it was having issues ignoring safety protocols, it was aware that staff members became sick with symptoms later associated with COVID-19, and there is disagreement in the US government about what the collected data means, but thanks to this article, we can definitively conclude that COVID-19 didn’t leak from that lab. Riiiiiiiiiiight.
So the article says it's inconclusive. Then you claim the article says there is a conclusion, and then claim you don't believe that conclusion.
Does that make no sense to anyone else?
i am sure that is exactly what they discovered... /s
What do you think they discovered?