Editorially, the paper strongly favors Israel, especially as it relates to the conflict with Palestine
I could have posted The Hill, same article but less factuality.
If you're going to post a MBFC promoting the factuality of a paper, you should also include other relevant information to allow people to make a fully-formed opinion. And if this article had been about, I dunno, salmon season in Alaska, I wouldn't have brought it up. But the fact that Jewish Press is intensely pro-Israel and rabidly anti-Palestinian is very relevant to any content about the war.
The MBFC is linked, is that too hard to use?
understandable
Got a tweet last night that Israel was sending peo0le to Cairo.
MBFC important and very relevant details:
I could have posted The Hill, same article but less factuality.
If you're going to post a MBFC promoting the factuality of a paper, you should also include other relevant information to allow people to make a fully-formed opinion. And if this article had been about, I dunno, salmon season in Alaska, I wouldn't have brought it up. But the fact that Jewish Press is intensely pro-Israel and rabidly anti-Palestinian is very relevant to any content about the war.
The MBFC is linked, is that too hard to use?
understandable
Got a tweet last night that Israel was sending peo0le to Cairo.
Anyway, this article says they will not return.
From who?
Pretty sure it was a reporter from Fox