Google cuts team of contractors who went on strike

L4sBot@lemmy.worldmod to Technology@lemmy.world – 153 points –
Google cuts team of contractors who went on strike
theverge.com

Google cuts team of contractors who went on strike::Google previously said the team of YouTube Music contractors were not employees since they were hired by Cognizant.

19

I mean.. Contractors.

Not employees

Their union struggle is with their paycheque-issuer .

If they're contractors then it's with the contract house.

But....is it?

The thing is that these contractors shouldn't expect to be in the same level as a regular employee in terms of importance. And if they didn't fire these people, but they simply didn't bother to renew the contract, then that solidifies that position.

This past few months (can't recall how long it has been) have been full of layoffs across various industries. Their position just became even weaker.

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A union representing contractors for YouTube Music claims that Google cut the workers’ contract after they went on a prolonged strike.

The Alphabet Workers Union-CWA, which represents the contractors, said the team consisted of moderators employed by Google contractor Cognizant in Austin, Texas, that was responsible for approving music content for YouTube Music.

In a statement emailed to The Verge, Google spokesperson Courtenay Mencini maintained the decision to cut the team did not lie with them but, rather, with Cognizant and said, “Contracts with our suppliers across the country routinely end on their natural expiry date.”

The team of more than 40 went on strike in February last year, demanding changes to Google’s return-to-work policy.

The union said many workers who were hired to work remotely are paid as little as $19 an hour, and going to the office would be too expensive.

It is disgusting that Google has taken this path when confronted with its workers’ modest demands to be treated fairly on the job,” said contractor and union member Jack Benedict in a statement.


The original article contains 377 words, the summary contains 176 words. Saved 53%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!