It's the API's job to validate it either way. As it does that job, it may as well parse the string as an integer.

https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/difference-between-put-and-patch-request/

Thanks to social media, youth unemployment, an uptick in asylum seekers, ballooning energy prices and oodles of nationalist right-wing cash, Macron is no longer the only politician with the regal ability to play Jupiter on TV. There are now a record 4,005 candidates running in the first round, with many fabled divinities to choose from.

There's your problem. Defund the rich.

When's the last time you donated to Lemmy.world?

only if there are ads

No more fighting against boxes of aid for these warriors.

Unfortunately, the "Processed Food Moral Panic" has been taken over by the meat and dairy industries, so people will not be learning why it's important to eat lots of plants as whole foods.

Squashing

The s "squash" command is where we see the true utility of rebase. Squash allows you to specify which commits you want to merge into the previous commits. This is what enables a "clean history." During rebase playback, Git will execute the specified rebase command for each commit. In the case of squash commits, Git will open your configured text editor and prompt to combine the specified commit messages. This entire process can be visualized as follows:

Note that the commits modified with a rebase command have a different ID than either of the original commits. Commits marked with pick will have a new ID if the previous commits have been rewritten.

https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/rewriting-history

You can also amend for a softer approach, which works better if you don't push to remote after every commit.

The git commit --amend command is a convenient way to modify the most recent commit. It lets you combine staged changes with the previous commit instead of creating an entirely new commit. It can also be used to simply edit the previous commit message without changing its snapshot. But, amending does not just alter the most recent commit, it replaces it entirely, meaning the amended commit will be a new entity with its own ref. To Git, it will look like a brand new commit, which is visualized with an asterisk (*) in the diagram below.

You can keep amending commits and creating more chunky and meaningful ones in an incremental way. Think of it as converting baby steps into an adult step.

It's a waste of time, the "NOVA" system is subjective and it makes testing it a dead end. Your question will not be answered.

It also doesn't teach nutrition to the people; the core application of it is demonizing food that isn't cooked at home, as if something made in a small home kitchen is magically healthful.

If you want to get a better grasp, here's a nice and short read: (shorter than a book) Series 5: Is the Ultra-processed Food (UPF) concept useful, and for what goals? | TABLE Debates

Please partake in the culture war, don't just let conservatives win by default.

check the authors' browser history

For those who don't know:

"The Southern Argument for Slavery"

Here: https://www.ushistory.org/us/27f.asp

Defenders of slavery argued that by comparison with the poor of Europe and the workers in the Northern states, that slaves were better cared for. They said that their owners would protect and assist them when they were sick and aged, unlike those who, once fired from their work, were left to fend helplessly for themselves.

PDF: https://www.allenisd.org/cms/lib/TX01001197/Centricity/Domain/1919/The%20Southern%20Argument%20for%20Slavery.pdf

NYT: https://www.nytimes.com/1859/01/19/archives/the-abolition-of-slavery.html

The "personal benefit" is a type of welfarist argument. As in the slave owners "gave them good lives" and that made it all OK.

an unbiased source

I don't think that the extraterrestrials are sharing news with humans.

It's embarrassing that he even got that far.

The farmers argued that banning the controversial dog meat from menus across the country would deprive them of their livelihoods.

All make this argument.

People have to decide if "livelihood" is the highest moral priority.

Signed: The Dark Brotherhood

Mass late-game zergling strategy?

for context

Now this is what "I just wanna grill" should refer to.

move into

...more like roll over and crush: "Israeli forces bulldoze Palestinian tents, crushing people alive" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5OcE8JqkZM

A distinction without a difference

clown world

my favorite order is:

educationally for those watching the disaster from a distance

Dogs Shot by Cops - Animal Legal Defense Fund

(US cops are famous for killing dogs)

remember this?

I don't think this will affect this dog farm: https://www.elwooddogmeat.com/

tl.dr.: driven by propaganda and a persecution complex or Jingoism

Israel’s path forward is unclear, and it will be influenced by a few issues. An increase in public pressure on Netanyahu may force him eventually to take responsibility for not preventing the Oct. 7 attack and resign.

Israel's dilemma is that you can't have both:

• An ethnonationalist (ethnic apartheid) state.
• Liberal democratic state with human rights and rule of law.

Pick one.

Drug cartels are black market capitalists.

"The Only Moral Abortion is My Abortion" By Joyce Arthur (copyright © September 2000)

Who would use that kind of type coercion? Who? I want to see his face.

It's much worse than that. The anti-abortion drive is anti-woman. Sure, it's a wedge issue for some politicians, but overall it's about rolling back women's rights until they're domestic non-citizens who depend entirely on their father, brother, uncle, husband. The anti-abortion drive also has the benefit of pleasing the ones who hate the poor, as the poor women are the most affected, while rich ones can "find ways around" the bans. In the US, that combines with racism too.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/5/15/1857976/--The-Only-Moral-Abortion-is-My-Abortion-an-article-by-Joyce-Arthur

The essence of conservatism being: "rights and liberty for me, but not for thee"

Desecration shows that there's no god reacting to the offense. It is a rational attack on faith.

No, no, I come to Lemmy for petty moneylaundering tips.

I recommend https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensraum

they like apartheid

Behavioral/policy similarity doesn't necessarily imply an alliance or partnership compatibility.

"liberty for me, but not for thee"

100 years from now the MENA region will be uninhabitable due to climate heating and I doubt that anyone will want to visit it in some spacesuit.