England seems to traditionally have the toilet separate from the house and for some reason the bidet trend never caught on
Uh... wut?
The UK has lots of old housing stock, built before the concept of indoor plumbing, so there was nowhere to put a toilet in lots of properties when they started to become a thing, hence you'd put it seperate from the house in an outhouse style set-up. We also lost less of the country to warfare during the two wars so didn't have to rebuild whole cities, so the conversion to move those toilets inside was still going on as we moved to the later half of the 20th century. My old man didn't have an indoor toilet in his childhood home until he was a teenager, he was born in the late 50s.
You still go to pubs these days that are old enough that the loos are disconnected from the main building as they've been there for so many years.
I live in the UK and nothing you've said here is congruent with my experience. I don't recall ever being in any building whatsoever that had no indoor toilet, including pubs.
there was
In the past. A long way in the past.
as we moved to the later half of the 20th century
The move to the later half of the 20th century was 70 years ago.
Near where my sister lives on the edge of Bristol there are several pubs with outdoor toilet blocks. It's usually country pubs or ones old enough to be listed. You're not going to find many in cities these days.
This must specifically be like, row homes, right? Where it's too tightly packed to fit a new room.
It's not like houses here in sweden are brand spanking new and yet they all have toilets nowadays even if some of them are ancient.
My old man's was semi-detached, but yeah density is part of the issue here too.
This what I've been told- I've never been to England, my understanding is that back in the day this was the way especially for suburban and farmland, and that that's why many old Australian houses still have the toilet separate. Obviously this doesn't apply to dense or modern areas.
Uh... wut?
The UK has lots of old housing stock, built before the concept of indoor plumbing, so there was nowhere to put a toilet in lots of properties when they started to become a thing, hence you'd put it seperate from the house in an outhouse style set-up. We also lost less of the country to warfare during the two wars so didn't have to rebuild whole cities, so the conversion to move those toilets inside was still going on as we moved to the later half of the 20th century. My old man didn't have an indoor toilet in his childhood home until he was a teenager, he was born in the late 50s.
You still go to pubs these days that are old enough that the loos are disconnected from the main building as they've been there for so many years.
I live in the UK and nothing you've said here is congruent with my experience. I don't recall ever being in any building whatsoever that had no indoor toilet, including pubs.
In the past. A long way in the past.
The move to the later half of the 20th century was 70 years ago.
Near where my sister lives on the edge of Bristol there are several pubs with outdoor toilet blocks. It's usually country pubs or ones old enough to be listed. You're not going to find many in cities these days.
This must specifically be like, row homes, right? Where it's too tightly packed to fit a new room.
It's not like houses here in sweden are brand spanking new and yet they all have toilets nowadays even if some of them are ancient.
My old man's was semi-detached, but yeah density is part of the issue here too.
This what I've been told- I've never been to England, my understanding is that back in the day this was the way especially for suburban and farmland, and that that's why many old Australian houses still have the toilet separate. Obviously this doesn't apply to dense or modern areas.