Apple considered switching to DuckDuckGo from Google for Safari - Bloomberg News

bathalumang_peppa@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.world – 1175 points –
Apple considered switching to DuckDuckGo from Google for Safari - Bloomberg News
reuters.com
291

You are viewing a single comment

Ah yes, the second largest company in the world “trying to stay relevant”

Im not really brand loyal to a gizmo company but the way android users are so insecure makes me never want to get them.

What is your argument for calling 70% of all phone users insecure?

Like this response is a good example of the insecurity im talking about thanks

This is hilarious because there’s a comment just above yours that’s exactly the same, just turned on its head.

I said it to the android guy and I’m gonna say it to you: pot, meet kettle.

You have truly defended your gizmo company sir, a true white knight of fair google. Not cringe at all

Lmao, I’m an apple user, all in on the ecosystem from phone to smarthome.

Good try though.

How is that a good example of insecurity of any kind?

I see the exact opposite, and you being triggered when no one even mentioned anything you're so offended about, proves the point.

It's totally not your insecurity talking, at all… but do go on…

Lol what made you conclude that OP uses Android?

I never mentioned OP

Then why gratuitously bash android for some weird user-related reason?

Im not bashing android i have to use one of their devices for work; it’s ok. The users on social media with the vitriol for apple and their need to defend android is really cringe.

I hear ya. To be honest, I don't really engage in such types of discussions - in terms of phones, gaming, browsers, hell, even movies!

Those kind of vitriolic discussions are led by a minority group who has nothing else to do in life but post stupid comments on the internet.

I could say the same about apple users. But then I go to the real world and notice that the vast majority of people couldn't care less about such dick- (or pussy-) measuring shenanigans.

To be honest the only company I see apple users bitch about is apple.

Which makes me ask the same question I asked in another comment: if you're going to bitch about Apple, then why keep buying Apple?

Maybe those Android users were former Apple users, then. (I say this half-jokingly, but I'm still curious about the question.)

Because people like to complain. Plenty to complain about android as well neither are perfect.

Absolutely, so going back to the original discussion, if "people are going to complain anyway," then people bashing Apple shouldn't be a reason not to consider Android.

Its not valid complaining, its vitriol towards other human beings for being “fan boys” or whatever, and how stupid they are for not picking their gizmo company.

Which we already established, it's a very stupid, very loud minority. Just like Apple users. If you haven't seen any Apple users bashing Android, then you're one lucky user.

Someone who barges in a discussion getting triggered when someone said something bad about his beloved company, says he's not. lmao

* In terms of profit, after the Saudi Arabian Oil Group. Huh, I had no idea.

Of all of the things that I vastly prefer since moving to Lemmy from reddit, anything related to Apple is not one of them. I'm actually surprised because talking about anything Apple on reddit was always a circlejerk pitchfork parade, but Lemmy still seems to outdo. The "trying to stay relevant comment" is honestly hilarious. Sure, the richest company with more than 50% of the smartphone market, that basically feeds design to the rest of the industry is trying to stay relevant.

And another thing worth addressing, It's probably 50/50 whether the EU is forcing them to USB-C, or just providing cover for them to move to USB-C. Modern Apple (after 1997) rarely has used proprietary standards for cables/connectors, and when they have it's pretty obviously because there isn't a better option, or more likely, there isn't an option that is suited to their purpose*. Apple is/was largely the reason we're even talking about USB, being one of the first to really adopt it. Then the dock connector for iPods, which is probably the most major example of them using a proprietary connector. If you read that link (just wiki) you'll see that the dock connector did things that no other standard connector did at the time, and it did it in a form factor that would work with iPods. Fast forward 10 years and Apple eats shit in the press for changing to Lightning, which pre-dated USB-C and has obvious advantages over one of the worst computer connectors in modern history - micro-USB**. Apple contributed significantly to the USB-C spec, which includes many of the advantages that Lightning had first, built off of the work they did with Intel in creating another standard, Thunderbolt.

And then on to today, where Apple is "forced" to use USB-C. Again, in 2016, Apple moved all of their high end laptops to exclusively USB-C, for which they would again be pilloried. People are still pissed those laptops dropped USB-A and MagSafe in favor of trying to drive adoption of USB-C and a one-connector-rules-them-all world. They also moved their Pro iPads over to C in 2018. Basically, Apple started moving its high-end, less price conscious customers to C long before legislation was a gleam in anyone's eye. Their cheaper products (base model iPads) and mass-consumer products (iPhones) they moved much slower on, and even then there were a slate of "Apple keeps changing connectors all of the time!" (twice in 20 years) outrage-bait articles.

Yes, Apple was "forced" to use the connector they created the first design references for (Lightning/Thunderbolt, and to a lesser extend Mini-DisplayPort) and then helped design, then moved to before most, in a bid to stay "relevant" in a field they already dominate.

* Also worth noting that Apple was a main driver of adoption of USB-A, and took heat when they converted iMacs to it over PS/2, far before most PC vendors did.

** This alone, the amount of negative press they garnered, meant that there was likely no way Apple was going to move iPhones off of Lightning for 10 years.