Donald Trump tells court he had no duty to ‘support’ the US Constitution

HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world – 998 points –
Donald Trump tells court he had no duty to ‘support’ the US Constitution
the-independent.com
138

You are viewing a single comment

the only one making a semantical argument, is Trump and his lawyers.

The problem is that the current Supreme Court clearly would support throwing that out, and they LOVE semantics like that to justify clearly bullshit decisions.

If interpreting laws is going to just turn into how much money a wealthy individual (or anyone wealthy enough to foot the bill) can argue the semantics of anything ..... what good and what use is any law?

We are long past the point where power and wealth buys better legal outcomes as evidenced by how few rich and powerful people over the last half century have spent any time in prison for their crimes compared to people with neither wealth nor power.

They also like using history to support their decisions. If it can be shown that the presidential oath is intended to go beyond "support" I would see the court being persuaded that "support" is implied by "protect, preserve, and defend". It depends on whether the textualists or the pseudo-historians win the day.

1 more...
1 more...