The article literally gives examples of the big conservative social media accounts making a fuss about the book list, including LibsOfTikTok which has millions of followers and frequently incites harassment and bomb threats toward their targets
I highly doubt the person you're replying to read the article I posted, nor did they actually do any additional research, as claimed, before deciding that this was "*fAkE nEwS." Because you're right, the sources of the boycotts are clearly cited in the article.
I read it. It's just the source is non credible and the Twitter post it points to is so small that it's obviously a non issue. The Twitter post having 2.1k likes. That's not significant.
It's just the source is non credible
What are you basing that claim on? Because it's patently false. They're a highly credible source with a clean fact-check record.
Overall, we rate Them.us Left Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that routinely favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record.
Bias Rating: LEFT
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
Failed Fact Checks:
None in the Last 5 years
So stop making things up. I actually know the sources I share on Lemmy are credible and will back it up every single time people try to start making up lies and shouting "fake news" because they don't like the headline of an article I've posted.
Show me a significant amount of Republicans boycotting froot loops besides the 2.1k likes on a Twitter post.
Look up LibsOfTikTok if you think this is not significant.
The article literally gives examples of the big conservative social media accounts making a fuss about the book list, including LibsOfTikTok which has millions of followers and frequently incites harassment and bomb threats toward their targets
I highly doubt the person you're replying to read the article I posted, nor did they actually do any additional research, as claimed, before deciding that this was "*fAkE nEwS." Because you're right, the sources of the boycotts are clearly cited in the article.
I read it. It's just the source is non credible and the Twitter post it points to is so small that it's obviously a non issue. The Twitter post having 2.1k likes. That's not significant.
What are you basing that claim on? Because it's patently false. They're a highly credible source with a clean fact-check record.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/them-us/
So stop making things up. I actually know the sources I share on Lemmy are credible and will back it up every single time people try to start making up lies and shouting "fake news" because they don't like the headline of an article I've posted.
Show me a significant amount of Republicans boycotting froot loops besides the 2.1k likes on a Twitter post.
Look up LibsOfTikTok if you think this is not significant.