After 151 years, Popular Science will no longer offer a magazinedantheclamman@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world – 310 points – 7 months agotheverge.com23Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentLet's not talk about Discovery channel either, it went from a history/national geographic channel to 24/7 reality TV.Same with the history channel. It's almost like the unrelenting pursuit of profit destroys interesting niches in the name of widespread appealNetwork decay, a common pattern.Aka your classic enshitification model.Huh, that's just enshitification with TVSeems like there’s a word for this…..
Let's not talk about Discovery channel either, it went from a history/national geographic channel to 24/7 reality TV.Same with the history channel. It's almost like the unrelenting pursuit of profit destroys interesting niches in the name of widespread appealNetwork decay, a common pattern.Aka your classic enshitification model.Huh, that's just enshitification with TVSeems like there’s a word for this…..
Same with the history channel. It's almost like the unrelenting pursuit of profit destroys interesting niches in the name of widespread appealNetwork decay, a common pattern.Aka your classic enshitification model.Huh, that's just enshitification with TVSeems like there’s a word for this…..
Network decay, a common pattern.Aka your classic enshitification model.Huh, that's just enshitification with TV
Let's not talk about Discovery channel either, it went from a history/national geographic channel to 24/7 reality TV.
Same with the history channel. It's almost like the unrelenting pursuit of profit destroys interesting niches in the name of widespread appeal
Network decay, a common pattern.
Aka your classic enshitification model.
Huh, that's just enshitification with TV
Seems like there’s a word for this…..