Pentagon official overseeing federal schools arrested in Georgia human-trafficking stingTheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world – 90 points – 7 months agonypost.com11Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentYou're not wrong. However, I am bound by Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. You could use a better source. For example: https://www.thedailybeast.com/top-pentagon-official-stephen-hovanic-arrested-in-human-trafficking-stingIs "Top Pentagon Official Arrested in Human Trafficking Sting" really that much better of a title?Not really, but at least it's not the trash that is the Daily Mail.Daily beast: the standard of journalismOP posted a link to the NY Post so I'm not sure what your point is.It is not a comment on your post, it is only about the NY Post and their sensationalism methods.
You're not wrong. However, I am bound by Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. You could use a better source. For example: https://www.thedailybeast.com/top-pentagon-official-stephen-hovanic-arrested-in-human-trafficking-stingIs "Top Pentagon Official Arrested in Human Trafficking Sting" really that much better of a title?Not really, but at least it's not the trash that is the Daily Mail.Daily beast: the standard of journalismOP posted a link to the NY Post so I'm not sure what your point is.It is not a comment on your post, it is only about the NY Post and their sensationalism methods.
You could use a better source. For example: https://www.thedailybeast.com/top-pentagon-official-stephen-hovanic-arrested-in-human-trafficking-stingIs "Top Pentagon Official Arrested in Human Trafficking Sting" really that much better of a title?Not really, but at least it's not the trash that is the Daily Mail.Daily beast: the standard of journalismOP posted a link to the NY Post so I'm not sure what your point is.
Is "Top Pentagon Official Arrested in Human Trafficking Sting" really that much better of a title?Not really, but at least it's not the trash that is the Daily Mail.Daily beast: the standard of journalismOP posted a link to the NY Post so I'm not sure what your point is.
Not really, but at least it's not the trash that is the Daily Mail.Daily beast: the standard of journalismOP posted a link to the NY Post so I'm not sure what your point is.
You're not wrong. However, I am bound by
You could use a better source. For example: https://www.thedailybeast.com/top-pentagon-official-stephen-hovanic-arrested-in-human-trafficking-sting
Is "Top Pentagon Official Arrested in Human Trafficking Sting" really that much better of a title?
Not really, but at least it's not the trash that is the Daily Mail.
Daily beast: the standard of journalism
OP posted a link to the NY Post so I'm not sure what your point is.
It is not a comment on your post, it is only about the NY Post and their sensationalism methods.