New York governor vetoes bill that would ban noncompete agreements

MicroWave@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world – 712 points –
New York governor vetoes bill that would ban noncompete agreements
apnews.com

New York’s governor vetoed a bill days before Christmas that would have banned noncompete agreements, which restrict workers’ ability to leave their job for a role with a rival business.

Gov. Kathy Hochul, who said she tried to work with the Legislature on a “reasonable compromise” this year, called the bill “a one-size-fits-all-approach” for New York companies legitimately trying to retain top talent.

“I continue to recognize the urgent need to restrict non-compete agreements for middle-class and low-wage workers, and am open to future legislation that achieves the right balance,” she wrote in a veto letter released Saturday.

The veto is a blow to labor groups, who have long argued that the agreements hurt workers and stifle economic growth. The Federal Trade Commission had also sent a letter to Hochul in November, urging her to sign the bill and saying that the agreements can harm innovation and prevent new businesses from forming in the state.

110

You are viewing a single comment

You have a source for that?

Hence the reason why I chose the likely being paid qualifier.

“I’m just asking questions!”

If you don’t understand the power that words hold then maybe don’t use them with such conviction.

those words described our situation tho. is there some reason people shouldn’t do that? i mean beyond “it’s not true 100% of the time.”

1 more...
12 more...

I understand what lobbying is, but thank you for the info. This doesn't relate specifically to this person, though. OP says they are likely taking money and i asked for a reason to suspect this person in particular unless the argument is just "they all do it" in which case it wouldn't be "likely".

Look up likely in the dictionary.

13 more...