Pope Francis: I don’t bless a ‘homosexual marriage.’ I bless two people who love each other.

Stamau123@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.world – 960 points –
Pope Francis: I don’t bless a ‘homosexual marriage.’ I bless two people who love each other.
americamagazine.org

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- People who act shocked that a priest would bless a gay couple but have no problem with him blessing a crooked businessman are hypocrites, Pope Francis said.

“The most serious sins are those that are disguised with a more ‘angelic’ appearance. No one is scandalized if I give a blessing to an entrepreneur who perhaps exploits people, which is a very serious sin. Whereas they are scandalized if I give it to a homosexual -- this is hypocrisy,” he told the Italian magazine Credere.

The interview was scheduled for publication Feb. 8, but Vatican News reported on some of its content the day before when the magazine issued a press release about the interview.

206

You are viewing a single comment

I mean....yeah? Did you think progress was going to come from the outside? Someone's gotta make an effort to steer the ship the right way.

Right? Credit where credit's due

What do you think would happen if he just came out and blessed gay marriage?

They’d claim he’s possessed by a demon and disappear him.

There'd be a schism, with the people who are currently getting upset instead just up and leaving. That might seem like a good thing, at first, but if the goal is to get everyone to heaven, you're not really achieving it if half the people are leaving.

I mean, you could say that you're not achieving it either way, but that's the thinking anyhow.

heaven isn’t real. literally all he has to do is come out and say “had a chat with god, turns out it was all a big misunderstanding. i bless gay marriage because being gay is ok!” the bar is so very low for him.

Regardless, I'm fairly sure he would disagree with you, and I was discussing his motivations.

yeah because he’s a stupid, evil man. this is very easy for him.

I try to be more generous than that when considering other people's motivations, even those whose actions I find despicable.

It obviously doesn't excuse despicable actions, but it does give the opportunity to recognize when people are trying to be better.

I hold leaders to a higher standard. you should too.

Holding leaders to a higher standard doesn't mean calling them evil because they believe something different than you, it means not letting them hide behind their religion for their choices.

But given that he does believe in heaven, and the organization he leads is made out of people who also believe in heaven, the fact that he's trying to get as many people there as possible is hard to fault him for, especially when the thing he's doing (telling the church to be more welcoming and kind to lgbtq folks) is objectively good.

When the pope says he can’t bless gay marriage, is that not letting him hide behind his religion for his choices?

Unfortunately what he is doing is little better than “hate the sin love the sinner”.

homosexuality is not a sin.

When the pope says he can’t bless gay marriage, is that not letting him hide behind his religion for his choices?

No, it's him acknowledging his religion and saying people should be kind and respectful anyway.

Homosexuality is a complicated subject among Catholics to say the least. Homosexual "acts" are officially a sin in Catholicism, and without the kind of change that would cause a schism, Francis can't change that. From his perspective, if it did cause a schism anyone on the wrong side of the schism would be in jeopardy, and even if they weren't they'd just continue on calling people sinners for being gay which Francis and the official stance of the church does oppose.

So the Pope saying it's okay to bless people even if you think they might be sinning may not be the most progressive thing in the world, may not be the most progressive thing he could say, but I do understand why he would say what he's saying instead of something more concrete.

I don't have to agree with everything he says or thinks to recognize that.

5 more...
5 more...
5 more...
5 more...
5 more...
5 more...
5 more...
5 more...
5 more...
5 more...
5 more...
5 more...

I’m rooting for the little guy! maybe he can work his way up to a mortal position with some leverage.

Progress won't come from any Christianity (and likely almost any religion, but I don't know others well enough to comment). They will either need to denounce the book as being bullshit and decide to progress or they will continue to hold society behind.

It's worth mentioning that during the dark ages, it was actually monks who preserved history and scientific knowledge, and advanced it. Even afterwards, Mendelian genetics was discovered by Gregor Mendel, a friar and abbot.

On top of that though, a lot of scientific knowledge and mathematics was preserved and cultivated by Islamic empires concurrent to the dark ages. They were in the middle of a golden age and progressed those fields further.

The problem isn't so much religion in itself, but evangelicals and literalists who put it above everything else. Zealots ruin it all.

Yeah, the Catholic Church guarded access to education, preventing the rest of the commoners from learning how poorly they translated the Bible to maintain control of the people. It's too bad the Protestant movement didn't destroy the Catholic Church.

You really need to see what progress has come through Christianity to see how absurd your statement is LOL.

You mean despite of Christianity.

The book is bigger than at its base. Our society cannot progress without removing it from a focal point.

The Catholic Church has sponsored plenty of progressive endeavors, both in the fields of science and otherwise. Which is to say nothing of the numerous Catholic people who have done progressive things and would place their faith as their reason for doing so. So there is a lot of progress that has been made because of the church.

That being said, there have also been far too many times where the church deliberately resisted important progress and/or attempted to undo it, hence progress despite the church.

I don't know where the balance lies on that, but I do think it's worth acknowledging both and even moreso acknowledging attempts from within to ensure more of the former and less of the latter.

Yes, for several hundred years, monks were the largest literate social group in Europe. Libraries and the invention of book printing would never have become so large without monasteries and the church.

In those times, science wasn't per se in opposition to the church, that is a relatively modern approach.

3 more...
3 more...
3 more...
4 more...
9 more...