My personal theory is that there's a biological split in our species. Like how some people taste soap when they eat cilantro and others don't. I think some of us are wired to need and want a leader and others do not. The evolution of not needing a leader has not fully propagated to the whole species yet.
This is an interesting theory and begs the question... From an evolution standpoint, which one would be more likely to win out?
It looks like every 20's we have the leader thing win against the freedom thing. Then the leader kind of turns against the followers and the freedom thing resurfacss agqin. But since the freedom thing needs a lot of responsibility thing and people eventually fail to secure themselves the leader thing naturally arises again.
My personal theory is that there's a biological split in our species. Like how some people taste soap when they eat cilantro and others don't. I think some of us are wired to need and want a leader and others do not. The evolution of not needing a leader has not fully propagated to the whole species yet.
This is an interesting theory and begs the question... From an evolution standpoint, which one would be more likely to win out?
It looks like every 20's we have the leader thing win against the freedom thing. Then the leader kind of turns against the followers and the freedom thing resurfacss agqin. But since the freedom thing needs a lot of responsibility thing and people eventually fail to secure themselves the leader thing naturally arises again.
Edit: fixed a thing.