It's a bullshit headline. The real benefit is quicker access to new, native features in the OS. So, for that reason, I'm happy they're making the move. But making it about how a utility product looks just seems... unimportant to me.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Seriously, I'm getting tired of hearing people throw around words like dated and modern to describe what are just a different styles of app UI.
There's nothing wrong with how it looks now. As long as the new look doesn't hide actual features and options while wasting screen space, I'll be fine with it, but there was nothing wrong with how it is now.
Sometimes it's justified. If an app looks like it was designed for Windows 3.1, Android C, or god forbid Motif, it just screams "hasn't been maintained in decades", and it looks terrible.
But yeah, I don't have any aesthetic complaints with Bitwarden. It's neither pretty nor ugly, just functional.
I'm happy with the current one, but sure.
It's a bullshit headline. The real benefit is quicker access to new, native features in the OS. So, for that reason, I'm happy they're making the move. But making it about how a utility product looks just seems... unimportant to me.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Seriously, I'm getting tired of hearing people throw around words like dated and modern to describe what are just a different styles of app UI.
There's nothing wrong with how it looks now. As long as the new look doesn't hide actual features and options while wasting screen space, I'll be fine with it, but there was nothing wrong with how it is now.
Sometimes it's justified. If an app looks like it was designed for Windows 3.1, Android C, or god forbid Motif, it just screams "hasn't been maintained in decades", and it looks terrible.
But yeah, I don't have any aesthetic complaints with Bitwarden. It's neither pretty nor ugly, just functional.