He's unquestionably a rapist, but he is not a convicted rapist.
Nope, just of sexual abuse. Which is, like…. Come on New York what’s the fucking difference here? Especially when you hear the story of what happened. I don’t understand how they talked the court down from rape to sexual abuse.
I don’t understand how they talked the court down from rape to sexual abuse.
Money
My understanding is that she wasn't able to say with 100% certainty that he put his penis inside her; that it could have been his finger.
Which I'm sure is something his lawyers push but is still a pretty sick burn to have on-record, and actually lines up with what his other victims say.
He's unquestionably a rapist, but he is not a convicted rapist.
Nope, just of sexual abuse. Which is, like…. Come on New York what’s the fucking difference here? Especially when you hear the story of what happened. I don’t understand how they talked the court down from rape to sexual abuse.
Money
My understanding is that she wasn't able to say with 100% certainty that he put his penis inside her; that it could have been his finger.
Which I'm sure is something his lawyers push but is still a pretty sick burn to have on-record, and actually lines up with what his other victims say.
Money and power
Yet.