Why do I have to agree with USA law when installing Fedora or openSUSE ?

Linux@lemmy.ml – 150 points – 7 months ago

Debian or Arch or Ubuntu never ask for my confirmation ?

Example :

You acknowledge that openSUSE Leap 15.3 is subject to the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (the “EAR”) and you agree to comply with the EAR. You will not export or re-export openSUSE Leap 15.3 directly or indirectly, to: (1) any countries that are subject to US export restrictions; (2) any end user who you know or have reason to know will utilize openSUSE Leap 15.3 in the design, development or production of nuclear, chemical or biological weapons, or rocket systems, space launch vehicles, and sounding rockets, or unmanned air vehicle systems, except as authorized by the relevant government agency by regulation or specific license; or (3) any end user who has been prohibited from participating in the US export transactions by any federal agency of the US government. By downloading or using openSUSE Leap 15.3, you are agreeing to the foregoing and you are representing and warranting that You are not located in,under the control of, or a national or resident of any such country or on any such list. In addition, you are responsible for complying with any local laws in Your jurisdiction which may impact Your right to import, export or use openSUSE Leap 15.3. Please consult the Bureau of Industry and Security web page www.bis.doc.gov before exporting items subject to the EAR. It is your responsibility to obtain any necessary export approvals.

You are viewing a single comment

View all comments

Code should be protected under the first amendment

Sure, but again. That is only legally binding in US jurisdiction?

Only binding in the USA. Thoroughly ignored outside of it.

Source code is — Bernstein v. United States Department of Justice

Thanks for mentioning this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernstein_v._United_States

The government modified the regulations again, substantially loosening them, and Bernstein, now a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, challenged them again. This time, he chose to represent himself, although he had no formal legal training. On October 15, 2003, almost nine years after Bernstein first brought the case, the judge dismissed it and asked Bernstein to come back when the government made a "concrete threat".

You are correct

There's no free speech under capitalism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_copyright

There is free speech in pretty much every capitalist country on the planet, but not in a single communist or socialist country of the present or past.

Keep your Communist ideals out if this please

5 more...