'Shark Tank' star Kevin O'Leary says pro-Palestinian student protesters are 'screwed' because employers can identify them through AIjerryh100@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world – 94 points – 5 months agobusinessinsider.com58Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentHe got rich making shovelware "educational" games and then selling the company with a gross overevaluation. He's a conman through-and-through.how was that a con?The gross evaluation part? Selling a turd as goldisn't that more of a ding on the other person not seeing through the BS?If you get mugged and beaten, is it your fault for being weak?You don't even need to go that far. By his definition cons can't exist because they depend on people not seeing through them.1 more...
He got rich making shovelware "educational" games and then selling the company with a gross overevaluation. He's a conman through-and-through.how was that a con?The gross evaluation part? Selling a turd as goldisn't that more of a ding on the other person not seeing through the BS?If you get mugged and beaten, is it your fault for being weak?You don't even need to go that far. By his definition cons can't exist because they depend on people not seeing through them.1 more...
how was that a con?The gross evaluation part? Selling a turd as goldisn't that more of a ding on the other person not seeing through the BS?If you get mugged and beaten, is it your fault for being weak?You don't even need to go that far. By his definition cons can't exist because they depend on people not seeing through them.
The gross evaluation part? Selling a turd as goldisn't that more of a ding on the other person not seeing through the BS?If you get mugged and beaten, is it your fault for being weak?You don't even need to go that far. By his definition cons can't exist because they depend on people not seeing through them.
isn't that more of a ding on the other person not seeing through the BS?If you get mugged and beaten, is it your fault for being weak?You don't even need to go that far. By his definition cons can't exist because they depend on people not seeing through them.
If you get mugged and beaten, is it your fault for being weak?You don't even need to go that far. By his definition cons can't exist because they depend on people not seeing through them.
You don't even need to go that far. By his definition cons can't exist because they depend on people not seeing through them.
He got rich making shovelware "educational" games and then selling the company with a gross overevaluation. He's a conman through-and-through.
how was that a con?
The gross evaluation part? Selling a turd as gold
isn't that more of a ding on the other person not seeing through the BS?
If you get mugged and beaten, is it your fault for being weak?
You don't even need to go that far. By his definition cons can't exist because they depend on people not seeing through them.