Trump’s Social Media Company Posts Q1 Revenue of $770,500 and Net Loss of $327.6 MillionRapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world – 448 points – 1 months agovariety.com53Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsI'm actually a bit shocked that the revenue is that high.Has to be money laundering. There's no way their operating costs are over $1B on a shitty Twitter clone with very little trafficI think you added a couple of 0s to the revenue. Cause nothing is close to $1b here.Hahah shit, you're right. I read 770k as 770m. I guess that ridiculous valuation set my expectations. 327m in expenses is still way too high. But no where near as absurd.Maybe they're on Azure.
I'm actually a bit shocked that the revenue is that high.Has to be money laundering. There's no way their operating costs are over $1B on a shitty Twitter clone with very little trafficI think you added a couple of 0s to the revenue. Cause nothing is close to $1b here.Hahah shit, you're right. I read 770k as 770m. I guess that ridiculous valuation set my expectations. 327m in expenses is still way too high. But no where near as absurd.Maybe they're on Azure.
Has to be money laundering. There's no way their operating costs are over $1B on a shitty Twitter clone with very little trafficI think you added a couple of 0s to the revenue. Cause nothing is close to $1b here.Hahah shit, you're right. I read 770k as 770m. I guess that ridiculous valuation set my expectations. 327m in expenses is still way too high. But no where near as absurd.Maybe they're on Azure.
I think you added a couple of 0s to the revenue. Cause nothing is close to $1b here.Hahah shit, you're right. I read 770k as 770m. I guess that ridiculous valuation set my expectations. 327m in expenses is still way too high. But no where near as absurd.Maybe they're on Azure.
Hahah shit, you're right. I read 770k as 770m. I guess that ridiculous valuation set my expectations. 327m in expenses is still way too high. But no where near as absurd.Maybe they're on Azure.
I'm actually a bit shocked that the revenue is that high.
Has to be money laundering. There's no way their operating costs are over $1B on a shitty Twitter clone with very little traffic
I think you added a couple of 0s to the revenue. Cause nothing is close to $1b here.
Hahah shit, you're right. I read 770k as 770m. I guess that ridiculous valuation set my expectations.
327m in expenses is still way too high. But no where near as absurd.
Maybe they're on Azure.