Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift’s Private Jet

0nekoneko7@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world – 337 points –
Congress Just Made It Basically Impossible to Track Taylor Swift’s Private Jet
gizmodo.com
62

You are viewing a single comment

billionaires get this sort of data privacy amendment, while regular Americans get surveillance capitalism as usual.

Well to be entirely fair, the amendment just says "private plane registration, so this should apply to billionaire jets but also down to the dinky weekend 1971 Cessna that a "regular American" owns

ETA: actually now that I think about it, drones above a certain dinky threshold also require registration, so those would be covered as well I'd think

I'm guessing the owner of a dinky 1971 Cessna most likely doesn't care if they can be found on an FAA tracker website. Taylor Swift and Elon Musk, on the other hand...

That Cessna owner also isn't as likely to be a target of violence from some fanatic (arguably justified or not).

Cool. Is there one shred of evidence beyond Elon's spurious claim that has ever happened?

Because if you are famous enough to worry about that and rich enough to fly around in a private jet and that worries you, hire security.

What this guy said. No way the richest people on earth are walking around without body guards.

9 more...
9 more...
9 more...

drones above a certain dinky threshold also require registration

Basically 0 chance that this law applies to RC helicopters/planes/multirotors. They don't contain GPS and they aren't monitored by air traffic controllers.

The newer regs boil down to you basically have to write your ID number in the canopy and avoid restricted airspaces... and who the hell is gonna roll by and check that you have a number written in your canopy? Maybe cops that get a complaint, and that is pretty rare. The older guys who have been in the hobby that I know completely ignore the newer regs, if you aren't bothering anybody then nobody cares.

9 more...