gotdamndownpunxx@fedia.io to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world – 1205 points – 3 months ago206Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentthats because water is already wet 😂 Water can’t be wet. Wetness is a property that water gives to something else.like waterNot at allid argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hotAnd you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy. Fire is not a liquid.i didnt say it was a liquidHence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.liquids which are......wetAgain, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wet75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...
thats because water is already wet 😂 Water can’t be wet. Wetness is a property that water gives to something else.like waterNot at allid argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hotAnd you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy. Fire is not a liquid.i didnt say it was a liquidHence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.liquids which are......wetAgain, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wet75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...
Water can’t be wet. Wetness is a property that water gives to something else.like waterNot at allid argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hotAnd you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy. Fire is not a liquid.i didnt say it was a liquidHence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.liquids which are......wetAgain, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wet75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...
like waterNot at allid argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hotAnd you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy. Fire is not a liquid.i didnt say it was a liquidHence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.liquids which are......wetAgain, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wet75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...
Not at allid argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hotAnd you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy. Fire is not a liquid.i didnt say it was a liquidHence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.liquids which are......wetAgain, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wet75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...
id argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hotAnd you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy. Fire is not a liquid.i didnt say it was a liquidHence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.liquids which are......wetAgain, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wet75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...
And you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy. Fire is not a liquid.i didnt say it was a liquidHence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.liquids which are......wetAgain, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wet75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...
i didnt say it was a liquidHence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.liquids which are......wetAgain, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wet75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...
Hence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.liquids which are......wetAgain, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wet75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...
liquids which are......wetAgain, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wet75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...
Again, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wet75 more...75 more...75 more...75 more...
so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wet75 more...75 more...75 more...
Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wet75 more...75 more...
thats because water is already wet 😂
Water can’t be wet. Wetness is a property that water gives to something else.
like water
Not at all
id argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hot
And you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy.
Fire is not a liquid.
i didnt say it was a liquid
Hence the fallacies.
Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.
liquids which are......wet
Again, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.
so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid?
wet.
Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.
because a liquid is wet