gotdamndownpunxx@fedia.io to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world – 1205 points – 4 months ago206Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentWater can’t be wet. Wetness is a property that water gives to something else.like waterNot at allid argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hotAnd you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy. Fire is not a liquid.i didnt say it was a liquidHence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.liquids which are......wetAgain, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wetNope. Wetness is something water can only give to other things, not itself or other liquids. Water is not wet. And no matter how you try to reason through this, you will continue to be wrong.74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...
Water can’t be wet. Wetness is a property that water gives to something else.like waterNot at allid argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hotAnd you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy. Fire is not a liquid.i didnt say it was a liquidHence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.liquids which are......wetAgain, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wetNope. Wetness is something water can only give to other things, not itself or other liquids. Water is not wet. And no matter how you try to reason through this, you will continue to be wrong.74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...
like waterNot at allid argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hotAnd you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy. Fire is not a liquid.i didnt say it was a liquidHence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.liquids which are......wetAgain, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wetNope. Wetness is something water can only give to other things, not itself or other liquids. Water is not wet. And no matter how you try to reason through this, you will continue to be wrong.74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...
Not at allid argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hotAnd you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy. Fire is not a liquid.i didnt say it was a liquidHence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.liquids which are......wetAgain, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wetNope. Wetness is something water can only give to other things, not itself or other liquids. Water is not wet. And no matter how you try to reason through this, you will continue to be wrong.74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...
id argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hotAnd you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy. Fire is not a liquid.i didnt say it was a liquidHence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.liquids which are......wetAgain, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wetNope. Wetness is something water can only give to other things, not itself or other liquids. Water is not wet. And no matter how you try to reason through this, you will continue to be wrong.74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...
And you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy. Fire is not a liquid.i didnt say it was a liquidHence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.liquids which are......wetAgain, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wetNope. Wetness is something water can only give to other things, not itself or other liquids. Water is not wet. And no matter how you try to reason through this, you will continue to be wrong.74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...
i didnt say it was a liquidHence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.liquids which are......wetAgain, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wetNope. Wetness is something water can only give to other things, not itself or other liquids. Water is not wet. And no matter how you try to reason through this, you will continue to be wrong.74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...
Hence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.liquids which are......wetAgain, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wetNope. Wetness is something water can only give to other things, not itself or other liquids. Water is not wet. And no matter how you try to reason through this, you will continue to be wrong.74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...
liquids which are......wetAgain, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wetNope. Wetness is something water can only give to other things, not itself or other liquids. Water is not wet. And no matter how you try to reason through this, you will continue to be wrong.74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...
Again, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wetNope. Wetness is something water can only give to other things, not itself or other liquids. Water is not wet. And no matter how you try to reason through this, you will continue to be wrong.74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...
so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid? wet.Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wetNope. Wetness is something water can only give to other things, not itself or other liquids. Water is not wet. And no matter how you try to reason through this, you will continue to be wrong.74 more...74 more...74 more...74 more...
Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.because a liquid is wetNope. Wetness is something water can only give to other things, not itself or other liquids. Water is not wet. And no matter how you try to reason through this, you will continue to be wrong.74 more...74 more...74 more...
because a liquid is wetNope. Wetness is something water can only give to other things, not itself or other liquids. Water is not wet. And no matter how you try to reason through this, you will continue to be wrong.74 more...74 more...
Nope. Wetness is something water can only give to other things, not itself or other liquids. Water is not wet. And no matter how you try to reason through this, you will continue to be wrong.74 more...
Water can’t be wet. Wetness is a property that water gives to something else.
like water
Not at all
id argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hot
And you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy.
Fire is not a liquid.
i didnt say it was a liquid
Hence the fallacies.
Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.
liquids which are......wet
Again, no. Wetness is a property liquids give to other things.
so if wetness is only something a liquid can give......what does that make the liquid?
wet.
Still no wetness is only something a liquid can give to something else, a solid.
because a liquid is wet
Nope. Wetness is something water can only give to other things, not itself or other liquids.
Water is not wet. And no matter how you try to reason through this, you will continue to be wrong.