Goldman Sachs: AI Is Overhyped, Wildly Expensive, and Unreliablecoyotino [he/him]@beehaw.org to Technology@beehaw.org – 288 points – 4 months ago404media.co77Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsGo-dAmn Sachs is wrong often, but in this I think they're on point. Learned from the Crypto insanity.Broken clock etc.And yet, worth 150 billion."valued at" != "worth"It's costing them money, and they're not sure they're going to get it back.They're notNaw if they're publicly bashing it they've already dumped on all the downside risk onto their customers and now they're net short.
Go-dAmn Sachs is wrong often, but in this I think they're on point. Learned from the Crypto insanity.Broken clock etc.And yet, worth 150 billion."valued at" != "worth"It's costing them money, and they're not sure they're going to get it back.They're notNaw if they're publicly bashing it they've already dumped on all the downside risk onto their customers and now they're net short.
It's costing them money, and they're not sure they're going to get it back.They're notNaw if they're publicly bashing it they've already dumped on all the downside risk onto their customers and now they're net short.
Naw if they're publicly bashing it they've already dumped on all the downside risk onto their customers and now they're net short.
Go-dAmn Sachs is wrong often, but in this I think they're on point. Learned from the Crypto insanity.
Broken clock etc.
And yet, worth 150 billion.
"valued at" != "worth"
It's costing them money, and they're not sure they're going to get it back.
They're not
Naw if they're publicly bashing it they've already dumped on all the downside risk onto their customers and now they're net short.