NASA is about to make its most important safety decision in nearly a generationjeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.world – 341 points – 3 months agoarstechnica.com97Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentFrom what I see Gwynne Shotwell is the one that's really doing the heavy lifting in the company.Seriously what is going on here? Okay? If that is or isn't correct what did I say that was wrong? Are you saying. People think Spacex is a failing company (when it isn't) because of Shotwell?They're just adding context. Calm down you have a real victim complex going on, and it's boring.It's not context because it's irrelevant to the point at hand. It's an adjacent point but it isn't related. I'm talking about people perception of SpaceX. The actual inner workings of the company is an irrelevant point.You can practically hear him flop sweating and hyperventilating.It's not a complex, he's reacting to the downvotes (that do seem unfair). He's being downvoted because people are pointing things out and he's arguing about them, even though they are reality. Exactly what "things" are you referring to? Also, his last post wasn't really even arguing... It was asking questions. He said Okay? If that is or isn't correct what did I say that was wrong? Which I have to say, is a more than reasonable question, it's an attempt to start a dialogue. Down voting a reply like that is just childish.I haven't said anything about it being a failing company, I'm just introducing some much needed information because of how much glazing I've noticed.Glazing for what? How?You don't seem to understand how spaceX works, so your assertions ignore those internals and paint the wrong picture.
From what I see Gwynne Shotwell is the one that's really doing the heavy lifting in the company.Seriously what is going on here? Okay? If that is or isn't correct what did I say that was wrong? Are you saying. People think Spacex is a failing company (when it isn't) because of Shotwell?They're just adding context. Calm down you have a real victim complex going on, and it's boring.It's not context because it's irrelevant to the point at hand. It's an adjacent point but it isn't related. I'm talking about people perception of SpaceX. The actual inner workings of the company is an irrelevant point.You can practically hear him flop sweating and hyperventilating.It's not a complex, he's reacting to the downvotes (that do seem unfair). He's being downvoted because people are pointing things out and he's arguing about them, even though they are reality. Exactly what "things" are you referring to? Also, his last post wasn't really even arguing... It was asking questions. He said Okay? If that is or isn't correct what did I say that was wrong? Which I have to say, is a more than reasonable question, it's an attempt to start a dialogue. Down voting a reply like that is just childish.I haven't said anything about it being a failing company, I'm just introducing some much needed information because of how much glazing I've noticed.Glazing for what? How?You don't seem to understand how spaceX works, so your assertions ignore those internals and paint the wrong picture.
Seriously what is going on here? Okay? If that is or isn't correct what did I say that was wrong? Are you saying. People think Spacex is a failing company (when it isn't) because of Shotwell?They're just adding context. Calm down you have a real victim complex going on, and it's boring.It's not context because it's irrelevant to the point at hand. It's an adjacent point but it isn't related. I'm talking about people perception of SpaceX. The actual inner workings of the company is an irrelevant point.You can practically hear him flop sweating and hyperventilating.It's not a complex, he's reacting to the downvotes (that do seem unfair). He's being downvoted because people are pointing things out and he's arguing about them, even though they are reality. Exactly what "things" are you referring to? Also, his last post wasn't really even arguing... It was asking questions. He said Okay? If that is or isn't correct what did I say that was wrong? Which I have to say, is a more than reasonable question, it's an attempt to start a dialogue. Down voting a reply like that is just childish.I haven't said anything about it being a failing company, I'm just introducing some much needed information because of how much glazing I've noticed.Glazing for what? How?You don't seem to understand how spaceX works, so your assertions ignore those internals and paint the wrong picture.
They're just adding context. Calm down you have a real victim complex going on, and it's boring.It's not context because it's irrelevant to the point at hand. It's an adjacent point but it isn't related. I'm talking about people perception of SpaceX. The actual inner workings of the company is an irrelevant point.You can practically hear him flop sweating and hyperventilating.It's not a complex, he's reacting to the downvotes (that do seem unfair). He's being downvoted because people are pointing things out and he's arguing about them, even though they are reality. Exactly what "things" are you referring to? Also, his last post wasn't really even arguing... It was asking questions. He said Okay? If that is or isn't correct what did I say that was wrong? Which I have to say, is a more than reasonable question, it's an attempt to start a dialogue. Down voting a reply like that is just childish.
It's not context because it's irrelevant to the point at hand. It's an adjacent point but it isn't related. I'm talking about people perception of SpaceX. The actual inner workings of the company is an irrelevant point.
It's not a complex, he's reacting to the downvotes (that do seem unfair). He's being downvoted because people are pointing things out and he's arguing about them, even though they are reality. Exactly what "things" are you referring to? Also, his last post wasn't really even arguing... It was asking questions. He said Okay? If that is or isn't correct what did I say that was wrong? Which I have to say, is a more than reasonable question, it's an attempt to start a dialogue. Down voting a reply like that is just childish.
He's being downvoted because people are pointing things out and he's arguing about them, even though they are reality. Exactly what "things" are you referring to? Also, his last post wasn't really even arguing... It was asking questions. He said Okay? If that is or isn't correct what did I say that was wrong? Which I have to say, is a more than reasonable question, it's an attempt to start a dialogue. Down voting a reply like that is just childish.
Exactly what "things" are you referring to? Also, his last post wasn't really even arguing... It was asking questions. He said Okay? If that is or isn't correct what did I say that was wrong? Which I have to say, is a more than reasonable question, it's an attempt to start a dialogue. Down voting a reply like that is just childish.
I haven't said anything about it being a failing company, I'm just introducing some much needed information because of how much glazing I've noticed.Glazing for what? How?You don't seem to understand how spaceX works, so your assertions ignore those internals and paint the wrong picture.
Glazing for what? How?You don't seem to understand how spaceX works, so your assertions ignore those internals and paint the wrong picture.
You don't seem to understand how spaceX works, so your assertions ignore those internals and paint the wrong picture.
From what I see Gwynne Shotwell is the one that's really doing the heavy lifting in the company.
Seriously what is going on here?
Okay? If that is or isn't correct what did I say that was wrong?
Are you saying. People think Spacex is a failing company (when it isn't) because of Shotwell?
They're just adding context. Calm down you have a real victim complex going on, and it's boring.
It's not context because it's irrelevant to the point at hand. It's an adjacent point but it isn't related.
I'm talking about people perception of SpaceX. The actual inner workings of the company is an irrelevant point.
You can practically hear him flop sweating and hyperventilating.
It's not a complex, he's reacting to the downvotes (that do seem unfair).
He's being downvoted because people are pointing things out and he's arguing about them, even though they are reality.
Exactly what "things" are you referring to? Also, his last post wasn't really even arguing... It was asking questions.
He said
Which I have to say, is a more than reasonable question, it's an attempt to start a dialogue. Down voting a reply like that is just childish.
I haven't said anything about it being a failing company, I'm just introducing some much needed information because of how much glazing I've noticed.
Glazing for what? How?
You don't seem to understand how spaceX works, so your assertions ignore those internals and paint the wrong picture.