As the judge said: they didn't read the packet, which CLEARLY shows the form, form type, fields noting the form...etc.
They fucked up.
Do you have the packet to see? I want to see whats so clear about it being invalid
Did you not read the ruling?
Ive only seen articles on the ruling. Link me to the packet please
Nobody needs to provide you with proof. You're some random commentor on the Internet. The Nevada Supreme Court reviewed all the material and made a ruling. Done deal.
Yeah, claims need proof. In all caps you're claiming the packet they received is CLEARLY invalid. I dont think you've seen it either to be able to make that claim. That link is just another article on the ruling, not the packet they received.
It's not me making a claim. You have no idea what you're talking about 😂
This is a court case that has been out there and decided. The ruling is in. Proof was presented at a fucking trial, where evidence is submitted and reviewed. This isn't MY opinion, it is the opinion of the Nevada Supreme Court.
Well if you had the proof you would have taken your easy victory already, since you seem firmly against backing up your claims im just gonna cut out, reinforced in my belief that this court decision was coordinated democratic sabotage.
Are you allowed to be out of your holding cell?
It went through FOUR courts, and all of them said the same thing. Your position again is that EVERYONE else fucked up here?
You asked for forms, they are right there. You asked for proof, it's right there. What in the fuck is your damage that you can't deal with reality?
The forms are not there
Well they are, because the ruling references. So does the article. Then the linked articles. Do you're just incapable of reading and following links?
Nothing links to a form of any kind
If you seriously can't read the screenshot you were sent, and can't follow the insane number of links from the article you were sent, you might be unfit for society.
As the judge said: they didn't read the packet, which CLEARLY shows the form, form type, fields noting the form...etc.
They fucked up.
Do you have the packet to see? I want to see whats so clear about it being invalid
Did you not read the ruling?
Ive only seen articles on the ruling. Link me to the packet please
Nobody needs to provide you with proof. You're some random commentor on the Internet. The Nevada Supreme Court reviewed all the material and made a ruling. Done deal.
Since you are lazy though: https://www.lawdork.com/p/green-party-nevada-scotus
Yeah, claims need proof. In all caps you're claiming the packet they received is CLEARLY invalid. I dont think you've seen it either to be able to make that claim. That link is just another article on the ruling, not the packet they received.
It's not me making a claim. You have no idea what you're talking about 😂
This is a court case that has been out there and decided. The ruling is in. Proof was presented at a fucking trial, where evidence is submitted and reviewed. This isn't MY opinion, it is the opinion of the Nevada Supreme Court.
Well if you had the proof you would have taken your easy victory already, since you seem firmly against backing up your claims im just gonna cut out, reinforced in my belief that this court decision was coordinated democratic sabotage.
Are you allowed to be out of your holding cell?
It went through FOUR courts, and all of them said the same thing. Your position again is that EVERYONE else fucked up here?
You asked for forms, they are right there. You asked for proof, it's right there. What in the fuck is your damage that you can't deal with reality?
The forms are not there
Well they are, because the ruling references. So does the article. Then the linked articles. Do you're just incapable of reading and following links?
Nothing links to a form of any kind
If you seriously can't read the screenshot you were sent, and can't follow the insane number of links from the article you were sent, you might be unfit for society.
I'm sorry you're so incapable.