Home DepotTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world – 888 points – 1 months ago124Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentPretty sure that's Italian for genre. Or a weird typo/autocorrect error/both 😁nope. it's the plural.The plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus... Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species. They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new "species" of image. Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.Still wrong because they are refering to an individual "species" of image, so it would be genus not genera.1 more...
Pretty sure that's Italian for genre. Or a weird typo/autocorrect error/both 😁nope. it's the plural.The plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus... Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species. They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new "species" of image. Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.Still wrong because they are refering to an individual "species" of image, so it would be genus not genera.1 more...
nope. it's the plural.The plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus... Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species. They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new "species" of image. Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.Still wrong because they are refering to an individual "species" of image, so it would be genus not genera.
The plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus... Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species. They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new "species" of image. Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.Still wrong because they are refering to an individual "species" of image, so it would be genus not genera.
Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species. They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new "species" of image. Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.Still wrong because they are refering to an individual "species" of image, so it would be genus not genera.
Still wrong because they are refering to an individual "species" of image, so it would be genus not genera.
Pretty sure that's Italian for genre. Or a weird typo/autocorrect error/both 😁
nope. it's the plural.
The plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus... Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species.
They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new "species" of image.
Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
Still wrong because they are refering to an individual "species" of image, so it would be genus not genera.