The state of Playstore

svotay@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.world – 1402 points –

Ads upon ads upon ads

295

You are viewing a single comment

No it wouldn’t. Phones aren’t cheap.

They can be. I bought a Galaxy s22 with a broken screen for $150, and my carrier just gave me an $1100 credit for it on a new iphone. I don't need an iPhone, and I will be selling it to get yet another cheap phone and pocketing the money, but it goes to show just how much phones do not cost to the people producing them

Dam that’s a hilarious life hack lol.

I’m on a 12 Pro with no intentions of upgrading but when I go to I’m gonna try and find a new broken flagship to turn in too lmao.

The Android licence is free and the Play Store infrastructure has to support tens of millions of devices.

I'm not saying this is an acceptable level, but Samsung ain't putting a dollar toward Google running the store, in fact, they'd much prefer to run and maintain their own.

I guess hoovering up all your data ain’t enough.

I don't even get why having the store on more devices is supposed to "cost" google anything.

It's a store. They get a cut from every transaction. Why wouldn't they want it to be on everything?

They shouldn't rely on ads to make money back on a phone IMHO.