That's a lot of words without much in the way of focus. To me, it reads like an attempt to pack as many likely search terms into a single article as possible. Giving every paragraph its own bold header is an interesting choice as well. If you're going to write "...a blog post detailing how [a recent government hack] occurred", it would make sense to write a blog post that focuses on a recent government hack as well as the details of how it occurred. As it is now, this appears to be something between a glossary of common terms, a collection of blog post titles and ideas along with a section containing the start of four case studies which could be a decent stand-alone article using this blog post's current title if fleshed out.
The Q&A section of the site could use a little proofreading as well but that's beside the point.
This is clickbait. No serious intelligence analyst would read this
Thanks soo much about feedback i will continue posting here about my posts and continue improving
Nah, we're good.
Gonna be honest, this reads like spam. There is zero substance to anything in this article. It just talks vaguely about random netsec aspects, but doesn't tie anything together or have any cohesive narrative. It feels AI-generated.
You forgot to mention which government.
My thoughts exactly.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/15/politics/us-government-hit-cybeattack/index.html
That's a lot of words without much in the way of focus. To me, it reads like an attempt to pack as many likely search terms into a single article as possible. Giving every paragraph its own bold header is an interesting choice as well. If you're going to write "...a blog post detailing how [a recent government hack] occurred", it would make sense to write a blog post that focuses on a recent government hack as well as the details of how it occurred. As it is now, this appears to be something between a glossary of common terms, a collection of blog post titles and ideas along with a section containing the start of four case studies which could be a decent stand-alone article using this blog post's current title if fleshed out.
The Q&A section of the site could use a little proofreading as well but that's beside the point.
This is clickbait. No serious intelligence analyst would read this
Thanks soo much about feedback i will continue posting here about my posts and continue improving
Nah, we're good.
Gonna be honest, this reads like spam. There is zero substance to anything in this article. It just talks vaguely about random netsec aspects, but doesn't tie anything together or have any cohesive narrative. It feels AI-generated.
Ahhahah is not G, can you give ideas for post