AI-generated articles prompt Wikipedia to downgrade CNET’s reliability rating
arstechnica.com
Futurism report highlights the reputational cost of publishing AI-generated content.
Futurism report highlights the reputational cost of publishing AI-generated content.
CNET has been spam for a long time
Any news site using Chatbots to right their articles should not be trusted.
Wait.. is Wikipedia publishing original research?!?!??!
Are these the people behind #1 malware site download.com? lmao should've been done ages ago
I learned that Wikipedia has a "reliable sources" table thanks to this. I'll check it out.
I can't recall a time when I went to Cnet to read re tech. I get tech stuff from Youtube and Verge.
The Wikipedia folks didn't demote Cnet after 1 week of discussion. Not 1 month. Not 6 months. Were they giving Cnet time to change for the better?